The Blog Heading -BMT
The Abstract heading no1
BLOG ABG FLASH MESSAGE
Manifesto Barisan Nasional (BN) PRU13 2013
AKUJANJI BN KEPADA RAKYAT MALAYSIA ( Klik Gambar untuk Akses Penuh)
Wednesday, 29 May 2013
Tuesday, 28 May 2013
BN silap ikut strategi badut Pakatan – Daim
Siapakah Penasihat PM Yang Harus Dipecat Bak Kata Tun Daim?
BN silap ikut strategi badut Pakatan – Daim
KUALA LUMPUR: Veteran Umno Tun Daim Zainuddin menyifatkan usaha Pakatan Rakyat menghimpunkan sejumlah besar rakyat untuk menunjukkan sokongan terhadap pembangkang sewaktu tempoh berkempen pilihan raya umum lalu umpama strategi ‘badut’.
Beliau berkata Barisan Nasional (BN) tidak sepatutnya mengikut rentak pembangkang beranggapan bahawa jumlah besar penyokong akan diterjemah ke dalam undi.
Malah Daim turut berpendapat Najib menggunakan populariti peribadi dalam usaha untuk membantu BN mendapatkan kembali majoriti dua pertiga Parlimen yang hilang pada tahun 2008 sebagai salah.
Pada pilihan raya umum 5 Mei lalu, BN berjaya membentuk kerajaan dengan majoriti mudah selepas menang 133 kerusi daripada 222 kerusi Parlimen, kurang tujuh kerusi berbanding pilihan raya 2008.
Daim yang ditemubual akhbar tempatan China Press, berkata kesilapan itu adalah punca BN hilang undi pada pilihan raya umum lalu.
“Penasihat PM harus dipecat. Jika anda mengaitkan undi untuk BN adalah undi untuk Najib, maka keputusan BN mencerminkan Najib juga,” ujar Daim.
“Pada pendapat saya, ia adalah strategi yang salah. Seperti yang saya katakan sebelum ini, ini adalah satu pilihan raya Parlimen, bukan pilihan raya presiden,” katanya.
“Biar Anwar menjadi penghibur. Kita bukan penghibur, kita tidak tahu bagaimana untuk menyanyi, menari dan membuat jenaka. Ia adalah satu urusan yang serius memilih kerajaan, jadi mari kita meninggalkan strategi badut ini dan tidak bermain dengan permainan itu. “
Daim turut berpendapat kegagalan BN untuk mendapat majoriti dua pertiga akibat salah agihan sumber peruntukan dalam usaha untuk menawan kerusi bandar serta kerusi majoriti Cina.
“BN tahu kawasan-kawasan majoriti Cina sudah tiada lagi. Mengapa membuang masa dan wang? Sebagai satu strategi, anda perlu menumpukan perhatian kepada kawasan-kawasan di mana anda kalah dengan majoriti tipis pada tahun 2008 dan mengukuhkan kedudukan di kerusi menang pada tahun 2008. Terdapat juga persoalan pemilihan calon, dan sebagai contoh di Pandan.
“Mari kita akui bahawa bukan mudah untuk mendapat majoriti dua pertiga di dalam dunia. Pengundi bandar di mana-mana adalah anti-kerajaan. Kekuatan BN terletak di kawasan luar bandar. Namun terlalu banyak masa dan wang telah dibazirkan di kawasan bandar di mana keputusan itu hampir pasti,” katanya.
Daim berkata demikian ketika diminta mengulas mengenai Pulau Pinang, di mana pertubuhan bukan kerajaan (NGO) pro kerajaan, Kelab Kebajikan Pulau Pinang 1Malaysia, telah menghabiskan banyak wang dalam menyediakan makan malam percuma dan konsert pada minggu-minggu menjelang hari mengundi.
“Orang-orang ini amatur. Mereka adalah orang-orang bodoh. Mereka fikir mereka bijak dan membuang wang. Lebih baik beri kepada kebajikan.
“Kenapa BN benarkan program bodoh seperti ini? Rakyat terasa terhina kerana mereka tahu anda fikir mereka boleh dibeli dengan wang, konsert dan makan malam. Jadi mereka datang untuk berehat, makan percuma. Ini adalah pilihan raya. Ia adalah satu perkara yang serius. Biar Anwar menjadi penghibur,” kata beliau.
Di Pulau Pinang, BN hanya menang 10 kerusi negeri selepas saingan Pakatan Rakyat memperoleh kemenangan besar dengan mengambil baki 30 kerusi negeri.
Dalam respons kepada soalan lain, Daim berkata BN sepatutnya memberi tumpuan kepada usaha menangani isu-isu yang dekat di hati rakyat seperti rasuah, urus tadbir yang baik, keselamatan, pendidikan, kadar inflasi, graduan muda dan miskin bandar.
Daim dalam pada itu berkata kekalahan BN di Selangor adalah akibat perbalahan dan sabotaj, yang berpunca daripada salah memilih calon.
BN hanya memenangi 12 daripada 56 kerusi DUN Selangor, kurang 20 kerusi berbanding 2008.
“Dengan calon-calon yang tidak turun padang, mengabaikan ketua-ketua bahagian, tidak melawat ahli-ahli dan pengundi, sabotaj, anda tidak boleh menang,” kata Daim. – AntaraPos
BLOG ABG
BN silap ikut strategi badut Pakatan – Daim
KUALA LUMPUR: Veteran Umno Tun Daim Zainuddin menyifatkan usaha Pakatan Rakyat menghimpunkan sejumlah besar rakyat untuk menunjukkan sokongan terhadap pembangkang sewaktu tempoh berkempen pilihan raya umum lalu umpama strategi ‘badut’.
Beliau berkata Barisan Nasional (BN) tidak sepatutnya mengikut rentak pembangkang beranggapan bahawa jumlah besar penyokong akan diterjemah ke dalam undi.
Malah Daim turut berpendapat Najib menggunakan populariti peribadi dalam usaha untuk membantu BN mendapatkan kembali majoriti dua pertiga Parlimen yang hilang pada tahun 2008 sebagai salah.
Pada pilihan raya umum 5 Mei lalu, BN berjaya membentuk kerajaan dengan majoriti mudah selepas menang 133 kerusi daripada 222 kerusi Parlimen, kurang tujuh kerusi berbanding pilihan raya 2008.
Daim yang ditemubual akhbar tempatan China Press, berkata kesilapan itu adalah punca BN hilang undi pada pilihan raya umum lalu.
“Penasihat PM harus dipecat. Jika anda mengaitkan undi untuk BN adalah undi untuk Najib, maka keputusan BN mencerminkan Najib juga,” ujar Daim.
“Pada pendapat saya, ia adalah strategi yang salah. Seperti yang saya katakan sebelum ini, ini adalah satu pilihan raya Parlimen, bukan pilihan raya presiden,” katanya.
“Biar Anwar menjadi penghibur. Kita bukan penghibur, kita tidak tahu bagaimana untuk menyanyi, menari dan membuat jenaka. Ia adalah satu urusan yang serius memilih kerajaan, jadi mari kita meninggalkan strategi badut ini dan tidak bermain dengan permainan itu. “
Daim turut berpendapat kegagalan BN untuk mendapat majoriti dua pertiga akibat salah agihan sumber peruntukan dalam usaha untuk menawan kerusi bandar serta kerusi majoriti Cina.
“BN tahu kawasan-kawasan majoriti Cina sudah tiada lagi. Mengapa membuang masa dan wang? Sebagai satu strategi, anda perlu menumpukan perhatian kepada kawasan-kawasan di mana anda kalah dengan majoriti tipis pada tahun 2008 dan mengukuhkan kedudukan di kerusi menang pada tahun 2008. Terdapat juga persoalan pemilihan calon, dan sebagai contoh di Pandan.
“Mari kita akui bahawa bukan mudah untuk mendapat majoriti dua pertiga di dalam dunia. Pengundi bandar di mana-mana adalah anti-kerajaan. Kekuatan BN terletak di kawasan luar bandar. Namun terlalu banyak masa dan wang telah dibazirkan di kawasan bandar di mana keputusan itu hampir pasti,” katanya.
Daim berkata demikian ketika diminta mengulas mengenai Pulau Pinang, di mana pertubuhan bukan kerajaan (NGO) pro kerajaan, Kelab Kebajikan Pulau Pinang 1Malaysia, telah menghabiskan banyak wang dalam menyediakan makan malam percuma dan konsert pada minggu-minggu menjelang hari mengundi.
“Orang-orang ini amatur. Mereka adalah orang-orang bodoh. Mereka fikir mereka bijak dan membuang wang. Lebih baik beri kepada kebajikan.
“Kenapa BN benarkan program bodoh seperti ini? Rakyat terasa terhina kerana mereka tahu anda fikir mereka boleh dibeli dengan wang, konsert dan makan malam. Jadi mereka datang untuk berehat, makan percuma. Ini adalah pilihan raya. Ia adalah satu perkara yang serius. Biar Anwar menjadi penghibur,” kata beliau.
Di Pulau Pinang, BN hanya menang 10 kerusi negeri selepas saingan Pakatan Rakyat memperoleh kemenangan besar dengan mengambil baki 30 kerusi negeri.
Dalam respons kepada soalan lain, Daim berkata BN sepatutnya memberi tumpuan kepada usaha menangani isu-isu yang dekat di hati rakyat seperti rasuah, urus tadbir yang baik, keselamatan, pendidikan, kadar inflasi, graduan muda dan miskin bandar.
Daim dalam pada itu berkata kekalahan BN di Selangor adalah akibat perbalahan dan sabotaj, yang berpunca daripada salah memilih calon.
BN hanya memenangi 12 daripada 56 kerusi DUN Selangor, kurang 20 kerusi berbanding 2008.
“Dengan calon-calon yang tidak turun padang, mengabaikan ketua-ketua bahagian, tidak melawat ahli-ahli dan pengundi, sabotaj, anda tidak boleh menang,” kata Daim. – AntaraPos
BLOG ABG
Monday, 27 May 2013
Sunday, 26 May 2013
Saturday, 25 May 2013
AUTA....AUTA.... TIAN CHUA GEDEBEH SEMASA DITANGKAP......
Video @tianchua Ditangkap @PDRMsia - Macam Budak Kecil, Nasib Baik Tak Gigit Telinga
Apa lagi nak kata kalau sebegini lembut tindakan anggota Polis ketika menangkap Ahli Parlimen Batu, YB Tian Chua yang akan didakwa atas Akta Hasutan, pagi tadi. Seperti biasa, YB Batu ini telah melakukan drama dengan tidak memberikan kerjasama sehingga memaksa anggota Polis untuk mengangkat beliau untuk masuk ke dalam kenderaan.
Nasib baik ada video di atas. Susah sikitlah juak-juak cybertroopers "Red Bean Army" DAP untuk memfitnah Polis DiRaja Malaysia adalah ganas. Nasib baiklah "mood" YB ini agak baik pagi ini. Kalau tidak pasti ada telinga Pegawai Polis yang akan digigitnya.
Nasib baik ada video di atas. Susah sikitlah juak-juak cybertroopers "Red Bean Army" DAP untuk memfitnah Polis DiRaja Malaysia adalah ganas. Nasib baiklah "mood" YB ini agak baik pagi ini. Kalau tidak pasti ada telinga Pegawai Polis yang akan digigitnya.
MatKilau Penang: SELEPAS TIAN CHUA DIBERKAS OLEH @PDRMsia ANWAR PUN...
MatKilau Penang: SELEPAS TIAN CHUA DIBERKAS OLEH @PDRMsia ANWAR PUN...: Anwar semakin pening kepala apabila Menteri Dalam Negeri, Datuk Seri Zahid Hamidi semalam berkata semua dokumen dan maklumat terperinci...
BLOG BN 2013
BLOG BN 2013
Friday, 24 May 2013
SUDAH TERANG LAGI BERSULUH : ANWAR BERSEKONGKOL DENGAN KUASA ASING UNTUK MENUMBANGKAN KERAJAAN BARISAN NATIONAL - SUMBER : http://altthainews.blogspot.com
US Prepares to Overthrow Malaysian Government
Key to encircling & containing China, US sets proxies in motion for color revolution in Malaysian streets.
Image: US-proxy Anwar Ibrahim leads a Bersih rally in Malaysia. While Bersih has attempted to claim it is "independent" and simply pursusing "fair and clean elections," it is clearly a vehicle for returning Anwar Ibrahim back into power. Additionally, Bersih shares the same ties to the US State Department's National Endowment for Democracy (NED) as its crypto-leader Anwar Ibrahim - representing a dangerous and seditious conflict of interest.
May 15, 2013 (AltThaiNews) - US-funded opposition fronts have vowed to overthrow the Malaysian government via disruptive and potentially violent street protests in the wake of general elections that saw their leader Anwar Ibrahim soundly defeated despite massive support from Western media, NGOs, and direct government intervention. Free Malaysia Today (FMT) reported in their article, "‘BN will be toppled this year’," that:
Pro-Pakatan Rakyat groups have vowed to overthrow the Barisan Nasional government this year through a massive street rally.
Speakers at a forum held yesterday unanimously agreed that waiting for five years until the next
general election was too long, and vowed to overthrow BN this year through “force”.
FMT also added that:
Electoral watchdog group Bersih 2.0 steering committee member Hishamuddin Rais pointed out that it was useless to take their unhappiness to the courts as he claimed the justice system was being controlled by the government.
“That is why we must take to the streets. We have to come out. What Najib likes is wrong, and what he doesn’t like is what we have to do,” he said.
“We will mobilise a big group and rally on the streets. This is not a threat, this is a promise,” he stressed.
Bersih, of course, is a US State Department-funded opposition front aimed to bolster US-proxy candidate Anwar Ibrahim, formerly of the IMF and World Bank, and a frequent visitor to the insidious National Endowment for Democracy (NED) in Washington D.C. It is in fact, NED that funds Bersih through its subsidiary, the National Democratic Institute (NDI).
The Malaysian Insider reported on June 27, 2011 that Bersih leader Ambiga Sreenevassan:
"...admitted to Bersih receiving some money from two US organisations — the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and Open Society Institute (OSI) — for other projects, which she stressed were unrelated to the July 9 march."
A visit to the NDI website revealed indeed that funding and training had been provided by the US organization - before NDI took down the information and replaced it with a more benign version purged entirely of any mention of Bersih. For funding Ambiga claims is innocuous, the NDI's rushed obfuscation of any ties to her organization suggests something far more sinister at play.
Photo: NDI's website before taking down any mention to Malaysia's Bersih movement. (click image to enlarge)
In addition to Bersih, other faux-electoral monitors are also directly funded by the US government. While the Western media attempts to portray such organizations as "independent," the Merdeka Center for Opinion Research, for example, is likewise funded directly by the US through NED.
Anwar Ibrahim himself was Chairman of the Development Committee of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 1998, held lecturing positions at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, was a consultant to the World Bank, and a panelist at the Neo-Con lined National Endowment for Democracy's "Democracy Award" and a panelist at a NED donation ceremony - the very same US organization funding and supporting Bersih and so-called "independent" election monitor Merdeka - paints a picture of an opposition running for office in Malaysia, not for the Malaysian people, but clearly for the corporate financier interests of Wall Street and London.
Photo: Taken from the US National Endowment for Democracy's 2007 Democracy Award event held in Washington D.C., Anwar Ibrahim can be seen to the far left and participated as a "panelist." It is no surprise that NED is now subsidizing his bid to worm his way back into power in Malaysia. (click image to enlarge)
Without a doubt, this premeditated sedition aimed at Malaysia's ruling government has been designed, funded, and directed from Washington on behalf of Wall Street and London, not by the Malaysian people on behalf of Malaysia's best interests.
The street protests conducted by Bersih have all the hallmarks of US-backed "color revolutions," and this recent attempt to overturn election results that do not favor an overt US-proxy, foreshadows the same destructive, divisive, violent, and regressive unrest that has plagued Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and Syria after US-engineered uprisings have left each in turn destabilized, failed states overrun by extremists, dictators, and traitors many times worse than the governments activists sought to overthrow.
And with Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and Syria in hindsight, will Malaysians fall into this same familiar trap? Whatever discontent Malaysians may have with the current government, it is all but assured Bersih and US-proxy candidate Anwar Ibrahim will compound perceived injustices while compromising Malaysia's political, social, and economic stability, and begin channeling Malaysia's resources and energy toward foreign interests and designs, particularly those involving the encirclement and containment of China.
An Alternative to the Tired Ploy of "Street Protests"
For the average Malaysian seeking progress, a better bet than joining US-funded sedition would be to turn their attention toward organizing locally and focusing on pragmatic, rather than political, goals. Education, local economic development, health, and local infrastructure are all areas Malaysians, regardless of political affiliations, can work together on and improve regardless of who holds public office.
And while special interests, both foreign and domestic, can indeed hinder such progress, they do not make such progress impossible. What is certain, is that corruption amongst Malaysia's ruling party pales in comparison to that of Wall Street and London - and Malaysians will place themselves in the path of guaranteed destruction by inviting in the very people who dominated them before achieving a hard-won independence.
Democracy, in reality, is supposed to be a bottom-up exercise drawn from the grassroots. Bersih is clearly a vehicle for Anwar Ibrahim and his political machine - one whose message is funded, crafted, and declared from Anwar's political advisers and foreign backers, and disseminated across the movement - however cleverly "democratized" Bersih may attempt to appear.
Malaysians do not need a political party to improve education, to grow their own food, to develop business locally by leveraging technology, or to improve local infrastructure and strengthen local communities. The time being wasted to assist Anwar Ibrahim's worming back into political power at the cost of peace, stability, and prosperity could be better spent developing truly grassroots pragmatic power.
Real revolutions do not happen out on the streets - they are manifested in our schools, across industry, and within our communities. They are marked by pragmatism and true, enduring technological and socioeconomic progress - none of which are even promised by Bersih and Anwar Ibrahim's "People's Alliance." If the people of Malaysia truly want "change," they are going to have to do it themselves by building local institutions that technologically and pragmatically solve real problems rather than simply craft slogans and campaign promises that merely pander to the concerns of the people. Following the flags of Bersih into the streets will undoubtedly begin instability and division across Malaysian society that will jeopardize, not spur, real and very necessary pragmatic progress.
Reference : http://altthainews.blogspot.com/2013/05/us-prepares-to-overthrow-malaysian.html
ADMIN - TANGKAP ANWAR !!! He is the root af all evils..............
BLOG ABG
Key to encircling & containing China, US sets proxies in motion for color revolution in Malaysian streets.
Image: US-proxy Anwar Ibrahim leads a Bersih rally in Malaysia. While Bersih has attempted to claim it is "independent" and simply pursusing "fair and clean elections," it is clearly a vehicle for returning Anwar Ibrahim back into power. Additionally, Bersih shares the same ties to the US State Department's National Endowment for Democracy (NED) as its crypto-leader Anwar Ibrahim - representing a dangerous and seditious conflict of interest.
May 15, 2013 (AltThaiNews) - US-funded opposition fronts have vowed to overthrow the Malaysian government via disruptive and potentially violent street protests in the wake of general elections that saw their leader Anwar Ibrahim soundly defeated despite massive support from Western media, NGOs, and direct government intervention. Free Malaysia Today (FMT) reported in their article, "‘BN will be toppled this year’," that:
Pro-Pakatan Rakyat groups have vowed to overthrow the Barisan Nasional government this year through a massive street rally.
Speakers at a forum held yesterday unanimously agreed that waiting for five years until the next
general election was too long, and vowed to overthrow BN this year through “force”.
FMT also added that:
Electoral watchdog group Bersih 2.0 steering committee member Hishamuddin Rais pointed out that it was useless to take their unhappiness to the courts as he claimed the justice system was being controlled by the government.
“That is why we must take to the streets. We have to come out. What Najib likes is wrong, and what he doesn’t like is what we have to do,” he said.
“We will mobilise a big group and rally on the streets. This is not a threat, this is a promise,” he stressed.
Bersih, of course, is a US State Department-funded opposition front aimed to bolster US-proxy candidate Anwar Ibrahim, formerly of the IMF and World Bank, and a frequent visitor to the insidious National Endowment for Democracy (NED) in Washington D.C. It is in fact, NED that funds Bersih through its subsidiary, the National Democratic Institute (NDI).
The Malaysian Insider reported on June 27, 2011 that Bersih leader Ambiga Sreenevassan:
"...admitted to Bersih receiving some money from two US organisations — the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and Open Society Institute (OSI) — for other projects, which she stressed were unrelated to the July 9 march."
A visit to the NDI website revealed indeed that funding and training had been provided by the US organization - before NDI took down the information and replaced it with a more benign version purged entirely of any mention of Bersih. For funding Ambiga claims is innocuous, the NDI's rushed obfuscation of any ties to her organization suggests something far more sinister at play.
Photo: NDI's website before taking down any mention to Malaysia's Bersih movement. (click image to enlarge)
In addition to Bersih, other faux-electoral monitors are also directly funded by the US government. While the Western media attempts to portray such organizations as "independent," the Merdeka Center for Opinion Research, for example, is likewise funded directly by the US through NED.
Anwar Ibrahim himself was Chairman of the Development Committee of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 1998, held lecturing positions at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, was a consultant to the World Bank, and a panelist at the Neo-Con lined National Endowment for Democracy's "Democracy Award" and a panelist at a NED donation ceremony - the very same US organization funding and supporting Bersih and so-called "independent" election monitor Merdeka - paints a picture of an opposition running for office in Malaysia, not for the Malaysian people, but clearly for the corporate financier interests of Wall Street and London.
Photo: Taken from the US National Endowment for Democracy's 2007 Democracy Award event held in Washington D.C., Anwar Ibrahim can be seen to the far left and participated as a "panelist." It is no surprise that NED is now subsidizing his bid to worm his way back into power in Malaysia. (click image to enlarge)
Without a doubt, this premeditated sedition aimed at Malaysia's ruling government has been designed, funded, and directed from Washington on behalf of Wall Street and London, not by the Malaysian people on behalf of Malaysia's best interests.
The street protests conducted by Bersih have all the hallmarks of US-backed "color revolutions," and this recent attempt to overturn election results that do not favor an overt US-proxy, foreshadows the same destructive, divisive, violent, and regressive unrest that has plagued Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and Syria after US-engineered uprisings have left each in turn destabilized, failed states overrun by extremists, dictators, and traitors many times worse than the governments activists sought to overthrow.
And with Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and Syria in hindsight, will Malaysians fall into this same familiar trap? Whatever discontent Malaysians may have with the current government, it is all but assured Bersih and US-proxy candidate Anwar Ibrahim will compound perceived injustices while compromising Malaysia's political, social, and economic stability, and begin channeling Malaysia's resources and energy toward foreign interests and designs, particularly those involving the encirclement and containment of China.
An Alternative to the Tired Ploy of "Street Protests"
For the average Malaysian seeking progress, a better bet than joining US-funded sedition would be to turn their attention toward organizing locally and focusing on pragmatic, rather than political, goals. Education, local economic development, health, and local infrastructure are all areas Malaysians, regardless of political affiliations, can work together on and improve regardless of who holds public office.
And while special interests, both foreign and domestic, can indeed hinder such progress, they do not make such progress impossible. What is certain, is that corruption amongst Malaysia's ruling party pales in comparison to that of Wall Street and London - and Malaysians will place themselves in the path of guaranteed destruction by inviting in the very people who dominated them before achieving a hard-won independence.
Democracy, in reality, is supposed to be a bottom-up exercise drawn from the grassroots. Bersih is clearly a vehicle for Anwar Ibrahim and his political machine - one whose message is funded, crafted, and declared from Anwar's political advisers and foreign backers, and disseminated across the movement - however cleverly "democratized" Bersih may attempt to appear.
Malaysians do not need a political party to improve education, to grow their own food, to develop business locally by leveraging technology, or to improve local infrastructure and strengthen local communities. The time being wasted to assist Anwar Ibrahim's worming back into political power at the cost of peace, stability, and prosperity could be better spent developing truly grassroots pragmatic power.
Real revolutions do not happen out on the streets - they are manifested in our schools, across industry, and within our communities. They are marked by pragmatism and true, enduring technological and socioeconomic progress - none of which are even promised by Bersih and Anwar Ibrahim's "People's Alliance." If the people of Malaysia truly want "change," they are going to have to do it themselves by building local institutions that technologically and pragmatically solve real problems rather than simply craft slogans and campaign promises that merely pander to the concerns of the people. Following the flags of Bersih into the streets will undoubtedly begin instability and division across Malaysian society that will jeopardize, not spur, real and very necessary pragmatic progress.
Reference : http://altthainews.blogspot.com/2013/05/us-prepares-to-overthrow-malaysian.html
ADMIN - TANGKAP ANWAR !!! He is the root af all evils..............
BLOG ABG
TERKINI! NURUL IZZAH DALAM SENARAI KEMUNGKINAN DITANGKAP
Blog pro-pembangkang sudah ada senarai baru ahli-ahli politik Pakatan Pembangkang yang 'menarik perhatian pihak polis'!
Di antara laporan blog tersebut :
Apa pun, rakyat Malaysia sudah bosan dengan politiking tidak habis-habis Pakatan Pembangkang dan juga anasir-anasir yang sengaja mahu memporak-perandakan kesejahteraan kita semua.
Sumber : Blog Dr. MIM
BLOG ABG
Kita tahu, Tian Chua yang sebelum ini dikutuk hebat kerana keceluparan mulut isu Lahad Datu, Adam Adli, seorang lain budak hingusan mulut celupar dan 2 orang ahli politik yang lain telah ditahan pihak polis.
Di antara laporan blog tersebut :
Menurut satu sumber antara yang menjadi buruan polis kerna merencanakan Perhimpunan "SuaraRakyat505" yang dijadualkan pada 26hb Mei 2013 ini ialah pengasas Solidiriti Anak Muda Malaysia (SAMM) Badrul Hishim Shaharin atau lebih dikenal sebagai CheguBard. Sumber yang sama mendakwa terdapat sekurang-kurangnya 5 individu lain yang turut menarik perhatian pihak polis.
- Badrul Hisham Shaharin, SAMM'Hebat' blog pembangkang ini, lebih tahu daripada pihak polis itu sendiri! Kita tunggu dan lihat.
- Nurul Izzah Anwar, Ahli Parlimen Lembah Pantai
- Hishamuddin Rais, blogger Tukar Tuib
- Dr. Dzulkefly Ahmad, mantan ahli parlimen Kuala Selangor
- Haji Mat Sabu, Timbalan Presiden PAS
Apa pun, rakyat Malaysia sudah bosan dengan politiking tidak habis-habis Pakatan Pembangkang dan juga anasir-anasir yang sengaja mahu memporak-perandakan kesejahteraan kita semua.
Sumber : Blog Dr. MIM
BLOG ABG
Thursday, 23 May 2013
Anak Seberang: Gempar Mengejutkan!! Video Yahudi Israel Berkempen...
Anak Seberang: Gempar Mengejutkan!! Video Yahudi Israel Berkempen...: Ni video kesedaran untuk imat islam melayu yang menyokong pembangkang sangat... Apa kena mengena rakyat Yahudi di Israel memperomosikan...
BLOG ABG
BLOG ABG
Tuesday, 21 May 2013
Pas Beruk: Anwar Gelabah Dokumen 'Siapa Dalang Pencerobohan L...
Pas Beruk: Anwar Gelabah Dokumen 'Siapa Dalang Pencerobohan L...: Anwar semakin pening kepala apabila Menteri Dalam Negeri, Datuk Seri Zahid Hamidi semalam berkata semua dokumen dan maklumat terperinci yang...
BLOG ABG
BLOG ABG
Zahid slammed in social media for controversial statement
KUALA LUMPUR: New Home Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi’s controversial statement that Malaysians who are unhappy with the country’s political system should leave the country, drew hard-hitting comments from social media users.
Many of the users, including several opposition politicians, criticised the statement written in an article titled, “Perhimpunan haram sebab tak terima hakikat gagal kuasai Putrajaya” (Illegal gathering because refuses to accept failure in controlling Putrajaya).
Among those who openly slammed Ahmad Zahid in Twitter is Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng.
Lim, in a tweet asked if Pakatan Rakyat (PR) supporters have to emigrate because they are unhappy with Barisan Nasional’s (BN) win, will BN supporters leave the states where PR is reigning.
Other Twitter users who are unhappy with the statement also joined the fray....damnnnnn..........!!
In the article, Ahmad Zahid said that illegal gatherings held by Pakatan Rakyat across the country was a form of escapism and denial of the fact that it failed to take control of Putrajaya.
“Malaysia inherited the political system from the United Kingdom and many Commonwealth countries also use the first past the post system where political parties contesting in the election will only have one representative in each constituency with the principle of a simple majority of votes.
“Opposition leaders particularly PKR and DAP have confused the young Chinese and the politically blind followers to dress in black to protest against the 13th general election results, which they consider is in their favor because of the popular vote.
“If these people wish to adopt the list system or the single transferable vote used by countires with the republic form of government, then they should migrate to these countries to practise their political beliefs.
“Malaysia is not a country to translate their political beliefs, even if they are really loyal to this country, they should accept the political system and the existing system to form a government as enshrined in the Federal Constitution,” he said.
Read more at:http://english.astroawani.com/news/show/zahid-slammed-in-social-media-for-controversial-statement-14315?cp
BLOG ABG
Kenyataan Pengerusi SPR jawab dakwaan Anwar pasal 'undi popular'
Merujuk kepada laporan media berhubung isu jumlah undi popular yang diperoleh parti-parti pembangkang, iaitu sebanyak 5,623,984 yang lebih tinggi daripada jumlah undi popular yang diperoleh parti BN, 5,237,699 yang mana mengikut dakwaan AnwarIbrahim sepatutnya parti pembangkang boleh membentuk kerajaan, tetapi mengikut
undang-undang pilihan raya di Malaysia parti BN yang telah disahkan menang dalam
PRU Ke-13 dan layak untuk membentuk kerajaan di peringkat pusat.
Berhubung dengan kekeliruan ekoran dari dakwaan pihak Anwar Ibrahim itu,
Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) ingin menjelaskan kepada rakyat bahawa di bawah
sistem dan undang-undang pilihan raya yang diguna pakai di Malaysia, sejak pilihan
raya umum pertama (1959) hingga Pilihan Raya Umum Ke-13 (PRU Ke-13), adalah
berlandaskan kepada sistem yang menentukan kemenangan mengikut majority
mudah (simple majority) serta bersandarkan kepada perwakilan mengikut kawasan
(Constituency Representation System) yang digunapakai sejak Pilihan Raya Umum
pertama hingga PRU Ke-13.
Berasaskan kepada sistem tersebut, calon yang menang dalam pertandingan bagi
sesuatu bahagian pilihan raya walaupun memperoleh majoriti satu undi, calon itu
diisytiharkan sebagai calon yang dipilih (menang dalam pilihan raya). Berasaskan
kepada asas yang sama, ia digunakan bagi menentukan parti yang berhak untuk
menubuhkan kerajaan baik di peringkat pusat ataupun di peringkat negeri, iaitu parti
yang mendapat jumlah perwakilan (kerusi) yang terbanyak walau pun memperoleh
majoriti satu kerusi, berdasarkan kepada undang-undang parti berkenaan diisytiharkan
menang dan berhak membentuk kerajaan.
Ini bermakna penentuan parti yang berhak membentuk kerajaan bukan berasas kepada
jumlah undi popular, iaitu jumlah bilangan besar undi yang diperoleh. Dalam konteks
ini, walaupun walaupun parti-parti pembangkang telah pun memperoleh jumlah besar
undi sebanyak 5,623,984, mereka hanya berjaya memenangi 89 (kerusi) bahagian pilihan
raya saja. Walaupun parti BN memperoleh jumlah besar undi 5,237,699, namun dari
sudut jumlah bahagian pilihan raya BN telah memenangi sebanyak 133 (kerusi) bahagian
pilihan raya di peringkat Parlimen dan berhak untuk membentuk kerajaan di peringkat
pusat.
Sistem pilihan raya tersebut itu di panggil sistem First Past The Post, iaitu calon yang
memenangi kerusi terbanyak dan menjadi wakil rakyat bagi bahagian pilihan raya yang
berkenaan sama ada bahagian Parlimen atau Dewan Undangan Negeri.
Penambahbaikan Proses Pilihan Raya Dalam PRU Ke-13
Berhubung dengan 8 perkara yang didakwa oleh Anwar, SPR perlu menjelaskan
bahawa Daftar Pemilih yang digunakan dalam PRU Ke-13 merupakan Daftar Pemilih
yang diwartakan dan telah melalui proses pembersihan yang terperinci melalui semakan
online dengan rekod warganegara dan alamat terkini pemilih seperti yang terdapat
dalam pangkalan data (data base) warganegara di Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara (JPN).
Daftar pemilih yang telah digunakan dalam PRU Ke-13 adalah daftar pemilih yang
terbersih mungkin yang disediakan oleh SPR. Oleh kerana sistem pendaftaran pemilih
menggunakan no.kad pengenalan 12 angka yang unik sebagai identifier pendaftaran,
maka mustahil terdapat pendaftaran berganda dalam Daftar Pemilih PRU Ke-13.
Melalui sistem pendaftaran ini, tidak ada sesiapa yang bukan warganegara sama ada
dia Bangladesh, Indonesia, China atau India, yang dapat mendaftar sebagai pengundi.
Selain itu Daftar Pemilih yang digunakan dalam PRU Ke-13 adalah Daftar Pemilih
yang sah dan diwartakan serta muktamad. Adalah mustahil untuk memasukkan nama-
nama pengundi tambahan selepas sesuatu Daftar Pemilih itu diwartakan untuk tujuan
pilihan raya. Oleh yang demikian andaian dan dakwaan kononnya terdapat 40 ribu warga
Bangladesh yang diangkut untuk mengundi dalam PRU Ke-13 baru-baru ini adalah
satu kenyataan yang tidak berasas dan fitnah semata-mata, kerana Daftar Pemilih yang
diwartakan itu adalah muktamad.
Dalam PRU Ke-13 juga, SPR telah melaksanakan proses Pengundian Awal bagi
anggota polis dan tentera serta pasangan. Proses Pengundian Awal adalah sebagai
menggantikan proses pengundian secara pos yang dilaksanakan bagi golongan kategori
pengundi tersebut. Dalam PRU Ke-13, urusan Pengundian Awal telah dijalankan pada
30 April 2013 yang melibatkan seramai 235,826 pengundi golongan anggota polis dan
tentera serta pasangan.
Selaras dengan tuntutan utama yang dibuat oleh parti-parti politik pembangkang dan
badan-badan bukan kerajaan tertentu dakwat kekal juga telah digunakan dalam PRU
Ke-13. SPR ingin menegaskan bahawa, penggunaan dakwat kekal dalam pilihan raya
adalah hanya sebagai elemen tambahan kepada prosedur pengundian bagi mengelakkan
sebarang percubaan untuk mengundi dua kali oleh mana-mana pengundi yang tidak
bertanggungjawab. Berdasarkan kepada undang-undang pilihan raya, asas utama untuk
menyemak identiti pengundi dan kaedah memastikan pengundi tidak dapat mengundi
lebih dari sekali ialah senarai nama di dalam Daftar Pemilih yang diguna pakai di setiap
Saluran/Tempat Mengundi pada Hari Pengundian. Jika nama seseorang itu tidak terdapat
dalam Daftar Pemilih atau namanya telah dipotong kerana telah mengundi, pengundi
itu tidak akan dapat mengundi lebih dari sekali. Ini bermakna pengundian berganda tidak
akan berlaku dalam proses pengundian di negara ini.
Tempoh rasmi kempen selama 15 hari telah ditetapkan untuk parti-parti politik
berkempen dalam PRU Ke-13, iaitu dari 20 April hingga 5 Mei. Oleh yang demikian,
dakwaan oleh Anwar Ibrahim yang menuduh SPR tidak melaksanakan apa-apa
penambahbaikan dalam PRU Ke-13 merupakan satu pembohongan yang besar untuk
mengelirukan rakyat serta fitnah semata-mata.
Sekian dan terima kasih.
(TAN SRI DATO’ SERI ABDUL AZIZ BIN MOHD YUSOF)
Pengerusi
Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya Malaysia
10 Mei 2013
BLOG ABG
undang-undang pilihan raya di Malaysia parti BN yang telah disahkan menang dalam
PRU Ke-13 dan layak untuk membentuk kerajaan di peringkat pusat.
Berhubung dengan kekeliruan ekoran dari dakwaan pihak Anwar Ibrahim itu,
Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) ingin menjelaskan kepada rakyat bahawa di bawah
sistem dan undang-undang pilihan raya yang diguna pakai di Malaysia, sejak pilihan
raya umum pertama (1959) hingga Pilihan Raya Umum Ke-13 (PRU Ke-13), adalah
berlandaskan kepada sistem yang menentukan kemenangan mengikut majority
mudah (simple majority) serta bersandarkan kepada perwakilan mengikut kawasan
(Constituency Representation System) yang digunapakai sejak Pilihan Raya Umum
pertama hingga PRU Ke-13.
Berasaskan kepada sistem tersebut, calon yang menang dalam pertandingan bagi
sesuatu bahagian pilihan raya walaupun memperoleh majoriti satu undi, calon itu
diisytiharkan sebagai calon yang dipilih (menang dalam pilihan raya). Berasaskan
kepada asas yang sama, ia digunakan bagi menentukan parti yang berhak untuk
menubuhkan kerajaan baik di peringkat pusat ataupun di peringkat negeri, iaitu parti
yang mendapat jumlah perwakilan (kerusi) yang terbanyak walau pun memperoleh
majoriti satu kerusi, berdasarkan kepada undang-undang parti berkenaan diisytiharkan
menang dan berhak membentuk kerajaan.
Ini bermakna penentuan parti yang berhak membentuk kerajaan bukan berasas kepada
jumlah undi popular, iaitu jumlah bilangan besar undi yang diperoleh. Dalam konteks
ini, walaupun walaupun parti-parti pembangkang telah pun memperoleh jumlah besar
undi sebanyak 5,623,984, mereka hanya berjaya memenangi 89 (kerusi) bahagian pilihan
raya saja. Walaupun parti BN memperoleh jumlah besar undi 5,237,699, namun dari
sudut jumlah bahagian pilihan raya BN telah memenangi sebanyak 133 (kerusi) bahagian
pilihan raya di peringkat Parlimen dan berhak untuk membentuk kerajaan di peringkat
pusat.
Sistem pilihan raya tersebut itu di panggil sistem First Past The Post, iaitu calon yang
memenangi kerusi terbanyak dan menjadi wakil rakyat bagi bahagian pilihan raya yang
berkenaan sama ada bahagian Parlimen atau Dewan Undangan Negeri.
Penambahbaikan Proses Pilihan Raya Dalam PRU Ke-13
Berhubung dengan 8 perkara yang didakwa oleh Anwar, SPR perlu menjelaskan
bahawa Daftar Pemilih yang digunakan dalam PRU Ke-13 merupakan Daftar Pemilih
yang diwartakan dan telah melalui proses pembersihan yang terperinci melalui semakan
online dengan rekod warganegara dan alamat terkini pemilih seperti yang terdapat
dalam pangkalan data (data base) warganegara di Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara (JPN).
Daftar pemilih yang telah digunakan dalam PRU Ke-13 adalah daftar pemilih yang
terbersih mungkin yang disediakan oleh SPR. Oleh kerana sistem pendaftaran pemilih
menggunakan no.kad pengenalan 12 angka yang unik sebagai identifier pendaftaran,
maka mustahil terdapat pendaftaran berganda dalam Daftar Pemilih PRU Ke-13.
Melalui sistem pendaftaran ini, tidak ada sesiapa yang bukan warganegara sama ada
dia Bangladesh, Indonesia, China atau India, yang dapat mendaftar sebagai pengundi.
Selain itu Daftar Pemilih yang digunakan dalam PRU Ke-13 adalah Daftar Pemilih
yang sah dan diwartakan serta muktamad. Adalah mustahil untuk memasukkan nama-
nama pengundi tambahan selepas sesuatu Daftar Pemilih itu diwartakan untuk tujuan
pilihan raya. Oleh yang demikian andaian dan dakwaan kononnya terdapat 40 ribu warga
Bangladesh yang diangkut untuk mengundi dalam PRU Ke-13 baru-baru ini adalah
satu kenyataan yang tidak berasas dan fitnah semata-mata, kerana Daftar Pemilih yang
diwartakan itu adalah muktamad.
Dalam PRU Ke-13 juga, SPR telah melaksanakan proses Pengundian Awal bagi
anggota polis dan tentera serta pasangan. Proses Pengundian Awal adalah sebagai
menggantikan proses pengundian secara pos yang dilaksanakan bagi golongan kategori
pengundi tersebut. Dalam PRU Ke-13, urusan Pengundian Awal telah dijalankan pada
30 April 2013 yang melibatkan seramai 235,826 pengundi golongan anggota polis dan
tentera serta pasangan.
Selaras dengan tuntutan utama yang dibuat oleh parti-parti politik pembangkang dan
badan-badan bukan kerajaan tertentu dakwat kekal juga telah digunakan dalam PRU
Ke-13. SPR ingin menegaskan bahawa, penggunaan dakwat kekal dalam pilihan raya
adalah hanya sebagai elemen tambahan kepada prosedur pengundian bagi mengelakkan
sebarang percubaan untuk mengundi dua kali oleh mana-mana pengundi yang tidak
bertanggungjawab. Berdasarkan kepada undang-undang pilihan raya, asas utama untuk
menyemak identiti pengundi dan kaedah memastikan pengundi tidak dapat mengundi
lebih dari sekali ialah senarai nama di dalam Daftar Pemilih yang diguna pakai di setiap
Saluran/Tempat Mengundi pada Hari Pengundian. Jika nama seseorang itu tidak terdapat
dalam Daftar Pemilih atau namanya telah dipotong kerana telah mengundi, pengundi
itu tidak akan dapat mengundi lebih dari sekali. Ini bermakna pengundian berganda tidak
akan berlaku dalam proses pengundian di negara ini.
Tempoh rasmi kempen selama 15 hari telah ditetapkan untuk parti-parti politik
berkempen dalam PRU Ke-13, iaitu dari 20 April hingga 5 Mei. Oleh yang demikian,
dakwaan oleh Anwar Ibrahim yang menuduh SPR tidak melaksanakan apa-apa
penambahbaikan dalam PRU Ke-13 merupakan satu pembohongan yang besar untuk
mengelirukan rakyat serta fitnah semata-mata.
Sekian dan terima kasih.
(TAN SRI DATO’ SERI ABDUL AZIZ BIN MOHD YUSOF)
Pengerusi
Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya Malaysia
10 Mei 2013
BLOG ABG
1 MALAYSIA: Mari kita berkenalan dengan askar cyber upahan DAP...
1 MALAYSIA: Mari kita berkenalan dengan askar cyber upahan DAP...: Perang alam maya telah bermula sejak empat tahun yang lepas. DAP mempunyai tentera mereka yang diberi nama RED Bean Army. Modus operandi ...
BLOG ABG
BLOG ABG
Monday, 20 May 2013
Anak Seberang: Lagi Kisah Akibat Kebiadaban Azran Botak Si Tangga...
Anak Seberang: Lagi Kisah Akibat Kebiadaban Azran Botak Si Tangga...: Pecacai Dap seronok dengan stetment Azran
BLOG ABG
BLOG ABG
Sunday, 19 May 2013
BADUT RAKYAT: KANTOI !!! #PRU13 !!! AKHBAR CINA SALAHKAN DAP ???...
BADUT RAKYAT: KANTOI !!! #PRU13 !!! AKHBAR CINA SALAHKAN DAP ???...: PRU-13 memperlihatkan kesumat kaum Cina yang tidak pernah padam kerana terpaksa menerima pemerintahan kerajaan Melayu.Jelas,mereka berad...
BLOG BN 2013
BLOG BN 2013
Saturday, 18 May 2013
CINA TIADA PILIHAN !!! TAAT ATAU TERIMA PADAH.....!!!
Cina Perlu Pilih Antara Malaysia 1st atau Chinese 1st
Kaum Cina Malaysia sebelum ini begitu galak menghentam sesiapa sahaja yang mempertahan hak Melayu atau yang mempersoal kesetiaan mereka kepada negara.
Tidak perlu pun menghina kaum Cina, tetapi sekadar memetik sejarah dengan mengingatkan mereka bahawa mereka adalah kaum pendatang juga, pasti akan menerima padahnya. Mereka tidak akan berhenti menyalak selagi yang terlibat tidak diambil tindakan.
Namun, bila pihak mereka menghina negara ini, orang Melayu, agama Islam dan kerajaan serta pihak berkuasa sehingga ke tahap memuatnaik penghinaan tersebut ke internet, ia tetap wajib dimaafkan. Jika tidak mereka akan menyalak juga bahawa kerajaan kejam.
Untuk menutup sikap berat sebelah serta pengkhianatan dan kebiadapan mereka, mereka tidak henti-henti memomokkan bahawa UMNO itu rasis atau Perkasa itu pelampau Melayu. Tuduhan ini dimainkan tanpa henti sehingga ia melekat kuat di hati dan pemikiran kaum itu.
Kononnya, mereka adalah kaum yang ditindas oleh UMNO dan Perkasa pula ingin meningkatkan penindasan tersebut. Kononnya kesemua kaum di Malaysia sukar untuk bersatu selagi kedua-dua organisasi ini yang menghalangnya. Malah mereka sering menyeru untuk kedua-dua organisasi ini mendahulukan ëMalaysiaà sebelum ëbangsaà (Malaysia 1st, Malay 2nd).
Hakikatnya, itulah yang UMNO dan Perkasa mahukan iaitu agar semua kaum mendahulukan Malaysia sebelum bangsa. Kerana itu juga kita mendesak kepada sistem satu sekolah untuk semua. Kerana itu juga kita inginkan semua kaum memperkasakan Bahasa Melayu yang menjadi bahasa kebangsaan bukan sahaja untuk memudahkan pergaulan tetapi juga untuk menjulang erti Malaysia 1st seperti yang dilaungkan kaum Cina.
Tetapi, yang menolak segala usaha ke arah ëMalaysia 1stà ini sebenarnya adalah kaum Cina sendiri.
Sudah terlalu banyak kali kita menyaksikan bagaimana kesetiaan mereka terhadap negara ini tidak asli. Lihat sahaja bagaimana Namewee menghina negara ini dan tiada seorang pun dari kaum Cina yang mengecam perbuatannya.
Lihat sahaja siapa yang menterbalikkan bendera Malaysia dengan BANGGA!? Malah, akbhar Utusan Malaysia hari ini juga telah mengulas tentang bagaimana kaum Cina yang sering memalukan Malaysia di luar negara.
Bukan kita tidak tahu begitu ramai kaum Cina yang keluar negara untuk belajar atau berhijrah gemar sekali memburuk-burukkan Malaysia tanpa sedikit pun rasa bersalah. Tiada sedikit pun rasa sayangnya kepada negara ini seolah-olah hidup mereka di sini tersangat susah, seolah-olah Malaysia begitu buruk, hodoh lagi busuk.
Sedangkan hakikatnya, di negara inilah mereka menikmati kemewahan malah diberi tempat di dalam kerajaan yang mana hampir mustahil bagi minoriti di negara lain. Malah, hanya di negara ini mereka dapat menubuhkan sekolah berasingan untuk bangsa mereka dengan diiktiraf dan dibantu kerajaan.
Hanya di negara ini mereka dibenarkan mencetak akhbar dalam bahasa ibunda yang giat menghasut dan memburukkan kerajaan. Hanya di negara ini, hari perayaan agama dan adat mereka diiktiraf sebagai cuti umum.
Namun, semua ini langsung tidak dihargai oleh mereka. Apabila BERSIH berdemonstrasi di sini, mereka yang berada di luar negara turut sama memakai baju kuning mengangkat sepanduk, bangga memfitnah negara sendiri.
Lihat saja apa yang terjadi kepada kaum Cina Malaysia yang bekerja di Singapura apabila terlalu ghairah membenci negara sendiri konon kejam dan terkongkong, mereka lupa bahawa negara yang mereka puja-puja sebagai sempurna itu adalah jauh lebih mengongkong lagi.
Akibatnya, mereka ditahan dan diambil tindakan tanpa bercakap banyak oleh pihak berkuasa negara itu sedang rakan-rakan mereka di Malaysia masih terus bebas berhimpun mencabar kerajaan di sana sini.
Oleh itu, pesan kita kepada kaum Cina hanya satu iaitu jika ingin terus membuat kerosakan, sekurang-kurangnya janganlah hipokrit. Usahlah berpura-pura setia kepada negara kerana semua orang tahu bahawa anda membenci negara ini.
Usah berpura-pura melaungkan ketelusan kerana parti DAP sendiri adalah bapa kepada segala ketidaktelusan sehinggakan ahli sendiri pun ditipunya secara terbuka dengan memanipulasi pemilihan CEC.
Usah berpura-pura kononnya ditindas kerana satu dunia tahu bahawa ekonomi negara ini dikuasai Cina.
Usah berpura-pura dengan melaung dan berhimpun konon tiada kebebasan bersuara sedangkan laungan dan himpunan itu sendiri telah menyatakan sebaliknya.
Usah berpura-pura inginkan perpaduan kerana perjuangan mempertahankan Sekolah Vernakular dengan sendirinya membuktikan bahawa kaum Cina tidak inginkan perpaduan.
Usah berpura-pura inginkan keadilan kerana perjuangan ke arah kesamarataan itu sebenarnya adalah helah untuk menelan kaum lain. Jika benar inginkan kesamarataan, maka kaum Cina perlu terlebih dahulu membahagi-bahagikan 80% bahagian mereka dalam kek ekonomi negara kepada kaum-kaum lain.
Justeru, pendek kata, usah berpura-pura lagi dan berdirilah atas perjuangan yang sebenar iaitu kaum Cina hanya pentingkan diri. Berkata benarlah bahawa apa yang kaum Cina perjuangkan hari ini hanyalah satu iaitu; untuk meletakkan kaum mereka di tempat paling utama atau Chinese 1st, Malaysia last.
Hakikat ini sudah jelas dan yang pasti kaum Cina sendiri sudah tidak dapat menafikannya. Justeru, kerajaan dan semua rakyat Malaysia wajar menerima hakikat ini dan menanganinya sebaik mungkin agar negara tidak hancur gara-gara ketamakan kaum Cina.
Sumber : Sg. Rapat Online
BLOG ABG
Kaum Cina Malaysia sebelum ini begitu galak menghentam sesiapa sahaja yang mempertahan hak Melayu atau yang mempersoal kesetiaan mereka kepada negara.
Tidak perlu pun menghina kaum Cina, tetapi sekadar memetik sejarah dengan mengingatkan mereka bahawa mereka adalah kaum pendatang juga, pasti akan menerima padahnya. Mereka tidak akan berhenti menyalak selagi yang terlibat tidak diambil tindakan.
Namun, bila pihak mereka menghina negara ini, orang Melayu, agama Islam dan kerajaan serta pihak berkuasa sehingga ke tahap memuatnaik penghinaan tersebut ke internet, ia tetap wajib dimaafkan. Jika tidak mereka akan menyalak juga bahawa kerajaan kejam.
Untuk menutup sikap berat sebelah serta pengkhianatan dan kebiadapan mereka, mereka tidak henti-henti memomokkan bahawa UMNO itu rasis atau Perkasa itu pelampau Melayu. Tuduhan ini dimainkan tanpa henti sehingga ia melekat kuat di hati dan pemikiran kaum itu.
Kononnya, mereka adalah kaum yang ditindas oleh UMNO dan Perkasa pula ingin meningkatkan penindasan tersebut. Kononnya kesemua kaum di Malaysia sukar untuk bersatu selagi kedua-dua organisasi ini yang menghalangnya. Malah mereka sering menyeru untuk kedua-dua organisasi ini mendahulukan ëMalaysiaà sebelum ëbangsaà (Malaysia 1st, Malay 2nd).
Hakikatnya, itulah yang UMNO dan Perkasa mahukan iaitu agar semua kaum mendahulukan Malaysia sebelum bangsa. Kerana itu juga kita mendesak kepada sistem satu sekolah untuk semua. Kerana itu juga kita inginkan semua kaum memperkasakan Bahasa Melayu yang menjadi bahasa kebangsaan bukan sahaja untuk memudahkan pergaulan tetapi juga untuk menjulang erti Malaysia 1st seperti yang dilaungkan kaum Cina.
Tetapi, yang menolak segala usaha ke arah ëMalaysia 1stà ini sebenarnya adalah kaum Cina sendiri.
Sudah terlalu banyak kali kita menyaksikan bagaimana kesetiaan mereka terhadap negara ini tidak asli. Lihat sahaja bagaimana Namewee menghina negara ini dan tiada seorang pun dari kaum Cina yang mengecam perbuatannya.
Lihat sahaja siapa yang menterbalikkan bendera Malaysia dengan BANGGA!? Malah, akbhar Utusan Malaysia hari ini juga telah mengulas tentang bagaimana kaum Cina yang sering memalukan Malaysia di luar negara.
Bukan kita tidak tahu begitu ramai kaum Cina yang keluar negara untuk belajar atau berhijrah gemar sekali memburuk-burukkan Malaysia tanpa sedikit pun rasa bersalah. Tiada sedikit pun rasa sayangnya kepada negara ini seolah-olah hidup mereka di sini tersangat susah, seolah-olah Malaysia begitu buruk, hodoh lagi busuk.
Sedangkan hakikatnya, di negara inilah mereka menikmati kemewahan malah diberi tempat di dalam kerajaan yang mana hampir mustahil bagi minoriti di negara lain. Malah, hanya di negara ini mereka dapat menubuhkan sekolah berasingan untuk bangsa mereka dengan diiktiraf dan dibantu kerajaan.
Hanya di negara ini mereka dibenarkan mencetak akhbar dalam bahasa ibunda yang giat menghasut dan memburukkan kerajaan. Hanya di negara ini, hari perayaan agama dan adat mereka diiktiraf sebagai cuti umum.
Namun, semua ini langsung tidak dihargai oleh mereka. Apabila BERSIH berdemonstrasi di sini, mereka yang berada di luar negara turut sama memakai baju kuning mengangkat sepanduk, bangga memfitnah negara sendiri.
Lihat saja apa yang terjadi kepada kaum Cina Malaysia yang bekerja di Singapura apabila terlalu ghairah membenci negara sendiri konon kejam dan terkongkong, mereka lupa bahawa negara yang mereka puja-puja sebagai sempurna itu adalah jauh lebih mengongkong lagi.
Akibatnya, mereka ditahan dan diambil tindakan tanpa bercakap banyak oleh pihak berkuasa negara itu sedang rakan-rakan mereka di Malaysia masih terus bebas berhimpun mencabar kerajaan di sana sini.
Oleh itu, pesan kita kepada kaum Cina hanya satu iaitu jika ingin terus membuat kerosakan, sekurang-kurangnya janganlah hipokrit. Usahlah berpura-pura setia kepada negara kerana semua orang tahu bahawa anda membenci negara ini.
Usah berpura-pura melaungkan ketelusan kerana parti DAP sendiri adalah bapa kepada segala ketidaktelusan sehinggakan ahli sendiri pun ditipunya secara terbuka dengan memanipulasi pemilihan CEC.
Usah berpura-pura kononnya ditindas kerana satu dunia tahu bahawa ekonomi negara ini dikuasai Cina.
Usah berpura-pura dengan melaung dan berhimpun konon tiada kebebasan bersuara sedangkan laungan dan himpunan itu sendiri telah menyatakan sebaliknya.
Usah berpura-pura inginkan perpaduan kerana perjuangan mempertahankan Sekolah Vernakular dengan sendirinya membuktikan bahawa kaum Cina tidak inginkan perpaduan.
Usah berpura-pura inginkan keadilan kerana perjuangan ke arah kesamarataan itu sebenarnya adalah helah untuk menelan kaum lain. Jika benar inginkan kesamarataan, maka kaum Cina perlu terlebih dahulu membahagi-bahagikan 80% bahagian mereka dalam kek ekonomi negara kepada kaum-kaum lain.
Justeru, pendek kata, usah berpura-pura lagi dan berdirilah atas perjuangan yang sebenar iaitu kaum Cina hanya pentingkan diri. Berkata benarlah bahawa apa yang kaum Cina perjuangkan hari ini hanyalah satu iaitu; untuk meletakkan kaum mereka di tempat paling utama atau Chinese 1st, Malaysia last.
Hakikat ini sudah jelas dan yang pasti kaum Cina sendiri sudah tidak dapat menafikannya. Justeru, kerajaan dan semua rakyat Malaysia wajar menerima hakikat ini dan menanganinya sebaik mungkin agar negara tidak hancur gara-gara ketamakan kaum Cina.
Sumber : Sg. Rapat Online
BLOG ABG
RBF Online: Kegagalan 'War Room' Menyumbang Kepada Kekalahan B...
RBF Online: Kegagalan 'War Room' Menyumbang Kepada Kekalahan B...: Sebelum daripada ini dah banyak pihak bercakap tentang war room yang banyak membuat keputusan dan menasihati Pengerusi BN, Datuk Ser...
BLOG ABG
BLOG ABG
House PK: HOUSE PK MENYOKONG PENUH KENYATAAN DATO SERI ZAHID...
House PK: HOUSE PK MENYOKONG PENUH KENYATAAN DATO SERI ZAHID...: Apabila Dato Seri Zahid Hamidi keluarkan kenyataan yang aku sokong 1000% maka mulalah Pakatan Haram menggelupor sebab Zahid kata kalau ...
BLOG ABG
BLOG ABG
Friday, 17 May 2013
Tuesday, 14 May 2013
Monday, 13 May 2013
TSUNAMI CINA - MESEJ SMS MAUT KEPADA KAUM CINA - TUMBANGKAN KERAJAAN BN DI PRU13 !!!
#IniHariLah- CINA SWING 6.30 Pagi 5 Mei 2013
Aku Tanya Semua Kawan-Kawan Cina, Semua Orang mengatakan Benda Yang sama, Semua dapat SMS Sekitar 6Pagi-7.30 Pagi yang menyeru semua kaum Cina menukar kerajaan BN dan menyatakan Kononya Anwar "Comfirm" Jadi PM Jam 8 Malam 5 Mei..
Apa yang berlaku sekarang ini, Kaum Cina Hari ini Sudah mula Goyang Takut dan bermacam-macam lagi
Hidup Kaum Cina di Malaysia ini 75% adalah Perniagaan..
Tindakan Mereka membuat Gerakan "merbahaya"(Cubaan Tukar Kerajaan) pada 5 Mei adalah Tindakan Paling Bodoh pernah dilakukan Oleh Orang Cina sepanjang mereka berada di Negara ini.
Aku Tak Kisah mereka nak buat Gerakan menumbangkan BN, Masalahnya hari ini, Kaum Cina walaupun sudah membuat gerakan besar-besaran (All Out) tetapi Kerajaan BN masih lagi tegak berdiri memerintah Negara.
Mereka Cukup Risau dan Takut Jika Najib tidak akan menolong dengan bersungguh-sungguh kaum cina. Akhbar-Akhbar Cina mulai semalam,sudah mula membalun DAP kerana membuat gerakan merbahaya yang gagal ini,mereka menyalahkan DAP,Kerana Politik yang DAP Bawa telah memberikan satu gambaran Jelas kepada Najib yang mereka ini tidak mahukan Perkhidmatan tetapi mereka mahukan Kuasa Politik yang lebih besar.
Apapun aku merasakan Gerakan 5Mei yang dilakukan Oleh Kaum Cina telah sampai tahap Tepu, mereka keluar seawal 7 Pagi dengan niat nak tumbangkan BN,Tetapi mereka Gagal. Untuk Rekod PRU13 Kaum Cina Seluruh Malaysia memberikan Undi Kepada BN Hanya 3% Sahaja...
Bayangkan dan renungkan...
Jasa Najib Razak Tidak Dikenang....
SUMBER : Keris Putera
Admin - CINA KEPARAT NI PATUT DI AJAR SEWAJARNYA !!! Ingat Nuar tu Tokong ke ??
BLOG ABG
Aku Tanya Semua Kawan-Kawan Cina, Semua Orang mengatakan Benda Yang sama, Semua dapat SMS Sekitar 6Pagi-7.30 Pagi yang menyeru semua kaum Cina menukar kerajaan BN dan menyatakan Kononya Anwar "Comfirm" Jadi PM Jam 8 Malam 5 Mei..
Apa yang berlaku sekarang ini, Kaum Cina Hari ini Sudah mula Goyang Takut dan bermacam-macam lagi
Hidup Kaum Cina di Malaysia ini 75% adalah Perniagaan..
Tindakan Mereka membuat Gerakan "merbahaya"(Cubaan Tukar Kerajaan) pada 5 Mei adalah Tindakan Paling Bodoh pernah dilakukan Oleh Orang Cina sepanjang mereka berada di Negara ini.
Aku Tak Kisah mereka nak buat Gerakan menumbangkan BN, Masalahnya hari ini, Kaum Cina walaupun sudah membuat gerakan besar-besaran (All Out) tetapi Kerajaan BN masih lagi tegak berdiri memerintah Negara.
Mereka Cukup Risau dan Takut Jika Najib tidak akan menolong dengan bersungguh-sungguh kaum cina. Akhbar-Akhbar Cina mulai semalam,sudah mula membalun DAP kerana membuat gerakan merbahaya yang gagal ini,mereka menyalahkan DAP,Kerana Politik yang DAP Bawa telah memberikan satu gambaran Jelas kepada Najib yang mereka ini tidak mahukan Perkhidmatan tetapi mereka mahukan Kuasa Politik yang lebih besar.
Apapun aku merasakan Gerakan 5Mei yang dilakukan Oleh Kaum Cina telah sampai tahap Tepu, mereka keluar seawal 7 Pagi dengan niat nak tumbangkan BN,Tetapi mereka Gagal. Untuk Rekod PRU13 Kaum Cina Seluruh Malaysia memberikan Undi Kepada BN Hanya 3% Sahaja...
Bayangkan dan renungkan...
Jasa Najib Razak Tidak Dikenang....
SUMBER : Keris Putera
Admin - CINA KEPARAT NI PATUT DI AJAR SEWAJARNYA !!! Ingat Nuar tu Tokong ke ??
BLOG ABG
Imperialism, The Cold War, and the Contradictions of Decolonization - The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG)
The Second World War had devastated the colonial empires of Western Europe, leaving the United States as the capitalist world’s undisputed superpower. At the same time, the war demolished the colonial system that had defined the imperialist era up until that point, giving rise to a new stage of imperialism called neo-colonialism.
In conjunction with this shift from colonialism to neo-colonialism, another shift occurred from intra-imperialist rivalry to intra-imperialist unity, as the former colonial empires joined together under the leadership of the United States into one imperialist world system, which I have labeled Trilateral Imperialism (in reference to the Triad: the U.S., Western Europe and Japan).
To be sure, there were still contradictions among imperialist nations, but these were non-antagonistic and could be resolved without war. No longer would Western Europe devour itself in barbaric conflicts over colonial possessions; now, they would merge together and plunder the third world as one.
As the last standing capitalist superpower, the United States was charged with redesigning the imperial landscape after WWII. The former colonial empires of Western Europe were in shambles and no longer had the ability to manage their colonies. The United States adopted a comprehensive aid program to help rebuild Europe and Japan, investing some of its capital surplus into the devastated economies of the capitalist world. The Marshall Plan, as it was called, was no altruistic gesture stemming from America’s noble spirit, but rather a way for American capital and products to penetrate European markets. In the end, the Marshall Plan pumped $13 billion into the reconstruction of Europe, reviving capitalism on a world scale.
The recovery of capitalism in fact began at the onset of WWII in the United States, with the war effort stimulating production on a massive scale. The New Deal government of Franklin D. Roosevelt also began implementing Keynesian economic policies, which would come to characterize the post-war capitalist economy. Keynesianism argued that capitalism, due to its inherent tendency towards underconsumption, required government intervention in the economy to stimulate aggregate consumption through government spending and progressive taxation. Similar measures were adopted in capitalist Europe after the war, resuscitating the economy and creating welfare states that limited the worse social consequences of capitalism, such as poverty, unemployment, and economic insecurity.
Along with the Marshall Plan, the U.S. pressured Britain and France to dismantle their colonial empires so that the whole third world could be opened up to American capital. Although the decolonized countries were seemingly independent, U.S. policy makers believed that these countries’ only purpose was to “provide raw materials, investment opportunities, markets and cheap labor” to “complement the industrial countries of the West” (Chomsky, 1992). Thus, the primary threat to the U.S.-led order were “’nationalist regimes” that dared to use their national resources to attain the “immediate improvement of the low living standard of the masses’”(Chomsky, “On Foreign Policy). The so-called “Cold War,” then, was conceived to be a war for U.S. control over the third world.
Formal colonies were no longer necessary to ensure the continuous transfer of wealth from the periphery to the metropolis and that is why the United States pushed for the abolition of colonialism. As one scholar of imperialism noted, “colonialism, considered as the direct application of military and political force, was essential to reshape the social and economic institutions of many of the dependent countries to the needs of the metropolitan centers. Once this reshaping had been accomplished economic forces – the international price, marketing, and financial systems – were by themselves sufficient to perpetuate and indeed intensify the relationship of dominance and exploitation between mother country and colony” (Magdoff, 139). Thus neo-colonialism was just as effective as colonialism.
The Cold War is often misinterpreted as a global conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union, the two contending world powers, with the U.S. working to contain Soviet ambitions of world domination. However, as declassified U.S. policy documents make clear, the primary threat posed by the Soviet Union was its willingness to supply military and economic support to third world regimes that were targets of U.S. aggression and subversion (NSC 68). The Soviet Union thus served to deter and restrain U.S. actions in the third world, which was unacceptable to U.S. imperial ambitions. Further, the Soviet system with its “autarkic command economy interfered with U.S. plans to construct a global system based on (relatively) free trade and investment, which, under the conditions of mid-century, was expected to be dominated by U.S. corporations and highly beneficial to their interests, as indeed it was” (Chomsky, 1992). To be sure, the Soviet Union betrayed the cause of socialism after the death of Stalin, becoming a social imperialist power in its own right. However, its imperial aims were limited to the region allotted to it under the Malta agreements and the threat it posed to the U.S. was its willingness to support nationalist third world regimes resistant to U.S. imperial demands.
Throughout the Cold War, the military-industrial-complex became a major part of the U.S. economy, and thus a catalyst for sustained growth, albeit sluggish starting in the 1970’s. For the Soviet Union, however, the “arms race” had the opposite effect of bleeding the Soviet economy and intensifying its internal contradictions until it imploded in 1989. With the collapse of the Soviet Union the Cold War came to an end, and with it, according to some, so did history. The triumph of the United States and Western Europe over the Soviet system proved to most people the superiority of free markets and capitalism. Free market euphoria swept the globe, giving birth to the new world order of neo-liberal capitalism.
Neo-liberalism, in stark contrast to Keynesianism, argued that economic growth required an end to government intervention in the economy (except in the military and prison sectors). Now the “invisible hand” of the market should rein unhindered, naturally allocating economic resources fairly and efficiently, creating a healthy equilibrium between supply and demand. Thus the era of Keynesianism and welfare capitalism came to an abrupt end, once again transforming the imperialist landscape.
The shift to neo-liberalism in the metropolis did not end neo-colonialism in the third world however. In fact, the neo-liberal onslaught began in the third world much earlier than it began in the developed world, starting with the U.S.-instigated coup in Chile in 1973. The third world was always encouraged to adopt trade liberalization and free market policies in order to facilitate the transfer of wealth from the third world to the U.S. and Europe. The shift to neo-liberalism in the metropolis only changed how neo-colonialism was enforced on the third world. Now international institutions, representing the collective economic will of the imperialist powers, emerged to impose neo-colonial policies on third world countries. The World Bank and International Monetary Fund gave third world countries “development loans” on the condition that they adopted “structural adjustment programs” designed to open their economies to western markets. Of course these policies did not lead to development, but only more intense underdevelopment for third world nations.
The neo-liberal empire of today is not the empire of one imperialist nation, but the empire of transnational corporations, based in the Triad, and enforced through U.S. and NATO military force. Neo-liberalism will not lead to the liberation or development of third world nations, but only their further underdevelopment and exploitation, as recent events in Iraq, Afghanistan and, most shamefully, Libya have proven.
The empire of today is the most destructive and dangerous empire that has ever confronted the human race. In the name of freedom, democracy, and economic prosperity, it is pillaging the third world at an unprecedented rate, leading to devastating wars of terror and occupation. The failures of capitalism should be clear to everyone not on its payroll, and the choice facing humanity today should be even more clear: Socialism or barbarism.
About Global Research
Centre for Research on Globalization / Centre de recherche sur la mondialisation
The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) is an independent research and media organization based in Montreal. The CRG is a registered non-profit organization in the province of Quebec, Canada.
In addition to the Global Research websites, the Centre is involved in book publishing, support to humanitarian projects as well as educational outreach activities including the organization of public conferences and lectures. The Centre also acts as a think tank on crucial economic and geopolitical issues.
The Global Research website at www.globalresearch.ca publishes news articles, commentary, background research and analysis on a broad range of issues, focussing on social, economic, strategic and environmental processes.
The Global Research website was established on the 9th of September 2001, two days before the tragic events of September 11. Barely a few days later, Global Research had become a major news source on the New World Order and Washington’s “war on terrorism”.
Since September 2001, we have established an extensive archive of news articles, in-depth reports and analysis on issues which are barely covered by the mainstream media.
In an era of media disinformation, our focus has essentially been to center on the “unspoken truth”.
During the invasion of Iraq (March-April 2003), Global Research published, on a daily basis, independent reports from the Middle East, which provided an alternative to the news emanating from the “embedded” journalists reporting from the war theater. Since 2004, Global Research has provided detailed analysis and coverage of US-NATO-Israel preparations to wage a pre-emptive nuclear attack on Iran.
Notes
- Chomsky, Noam, “Deterring Democracy,” (1992), retrieved online athttp://books.zcommunications.org/chomsky/dd/dd-c01-s07.html.
- Chomsky, Noam, “What Uncle Sam Really Wants,” retrieved online athttp://books.zcommunications.org/chomsky/dd/dd-c01-s07.html.
- Magdoff, Harry. Imperialism: From the Colonial Age to the Present. Monthly Review Press (1978).
SUMBER : http://www.globalresearch.ca/imperialism-the-cold-war-and-the-contradictions-of-decolonization/5334692
BLOG ABG
SUDAH TERANG LAGI BERSULUH : Penglibatan Asing di belakang PKR dan BERSIH !!! KEMENANGAN 2-0 BUAT MALAYSIA !!! (Menyekat kemaraan pengaruh BERSIH dan mengalahkan Pakatan Rakyat di dalam PRU13 ) - Syabas buat PM Najib Razak !!
Malaysia: Failure of U.S. to Subvert the Elections and Install a “Proxy Regime”
US "Pivot" Toward Asia Trips in Malaysia
Wall Street and London’s hegemonic ambitions in Asia, centered around installing proxy regimes across Southeast Asia and using the supranational ASEAN bloc to encircle and contain China, suffered a serious blow this week when Western-proxy and Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim’s party lost in general elections.While Anwar Ibrahim’s opposition party, Pakatan Rakyat (PR) or “People’s Alliance,” attempted to run on an anti-corruption platform, its campaign instead resembled verbatim attempts by the West to subvert governments politically around the world, including most recently in Venezuela, and in Russia in 2012.Just as in Russia where so-called “independent” election monitor GOLOS turned out to be fully funded by the US State Department through the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), Malaysia’s so-called election monitor, the Merdeka Center for Opinion Research, is likewise funded directly by the US through NED. Despite this, Western media outlets, in pursuit of promoting the Western-backed People’s Alliance, has repeatedly referred to Merdeka as “independent.”
Image: Despite the US mobilizing the summation of its media power and pouring millions of dollars into the opposition party, including the creation and perpetuation of fake-NGOs such as Bersih and the Merdeka Center, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak sailed to a comfortable victory in this year’s general elections. The cheap veneer has begun peeling away from America’s “democracy promotion” racket, leaving its proxies exposed and frantic, and America’s hegemonic ambitions across Asia in serious question.
The BBC in its article, “Malaysia election sees record turnout,” lays out the well-rehearsed cries of “stolen elections” used by the West to undermine the legitimacy of polls it fears its proxy candidates may lose – with the US-funded Merdeka Center cited in attempts to bolster these claims. Their foreign funding and compromised objectivity is never mentioned (emphasis added) :
Allegations of election fraud surfaced before the election. Some of those who voted in advance told BBC News that indelible ink – supposed to last for days – easily washed off.“The indelible ink can be washed off easily, with just water, in a few seconds,” one voter, Lo, told BBC News from Skudai.Another voter wrote: “Marked with “indelible ink” and voted at 10:00. Have already cleaned off the ink by 12:00. If I was also registered under a different name and ID number at a neighbouring constituency, I would be able to vote again before 17:00!”The opposition has also accused the government of funding flights for supporters to key states, which the government denies.Independent pollster Merdeka Center has received unconfirmed reports of foreign nationals being given IDs and allowed to vote.
However, an election monitoring organization funded by a foreign government which openly seeks to remove the current ruling party from Malaysia in favor of long-time Wall Street servant Anwar Ibrahim is most certainly not “independent.”
The ties between Anwar Ibrahim’s “People’s Alliance” and the US State Department don’t end with the Merdeka Center, but continue into the opposition’s street movement, “Bersih.” Claiming to fight for “clean and fair” elections, Bersih in reality is a vehicle designed to mobilize street protests on behalf of Anwar’s opposition party. Bersih’s alleged leader, Ambiga Sreenevasan, has admitted herself that her organization has received cash directly from the United States via the National Endowment for Democracy’s National Democratic Institute (NDI), and convicted criminal George Soros’ Open Society.
The Malaysian Insider reported on June 27, 2011 that Bersih leader Ambiga Sreenevassan:
“…admitted to Bersih receiving some money from two US organisations — the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and Open Society Institute (OSI) — for other projects, which she stressed were unrelated to the July 9 march.”
A visit to the NDI website revealed indeed that funding and training had been provided by the US organization – before NDI took down the information and replaced it with a more benign version purged entirely of any mention of Bersih. For funding Ambiga claims is innocuous, the NDI’s rushed obfuscation of any ties to her organization suggests something far more sinister at play.
Photo: NDI’s website before taking down any mention to Malaysia’s Bersih movement. (click image to enlarge)
….
The substantial, yet carefully obfuscated support the West has lent Anwar should be of no surprise to those familiar with Anwar’s history. That Anwar Ibrahim himself was Chairman of the Development Committee of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 1998, held lecturing positions at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, was a consultant to the World Bank, and a panelist at the Neo-Con lined National Endowment for Democracy’s “Democracy Award” and a panelist at a NED donation ceremony – the very same US organization funding and supporting Bersih and so-called “independent” election monitor Merdeka – paints a picture of an opposition running for office in Malaysia, not for the Malaysian people, but clearly for the corporate financier interests of Wall Street and London.
Photo: Taken from the US National Endowment for Democracy’s 2007 Democracy Award eventheld in Washington D.C., Anwar Ibrahim can be seen to the far left and participated as a “panelist.” It is no surprise that NED is now subsidizing his bid to worm his way back into power in Malaysia. (click image to enlarge)
….
In reality, Bersih’s leadership along with Anwar and their host of foreign sponsors are attempting to galvanize the very real grievances of the Malaysian people and exploit them to propel themselves into power. While many may be tempted to suggest that “clean and fair elections” truly are Bersih and Anwar’s goal, and that US funding via NED’s NDI are entirely innocuous, a thorough examination of these organizations, how they operate, and their admitted agenda reveals the proverbial cliff Anwar and Bersih are leading their followers and the nation of Malaysia over.
As Bersih predictably mobilizes in the streets on behalf of Anwar’s opposition party in the wake of their collective failure during Malaysia’s 2013 general elections, it is important for Malaysians to understand the true nature of the Western organizations funding their attempts to politically undermine the ruling party and divide Malaysians against each other, and exactly why this is being done in the greater context of US hegemony in Asia.
Anwar & Bersih’s US State Department Backers
The US State Department’s NED and NDI are most certainly not benevolent promoters of democracy and freedom.Does Boeing, Goldman Sachs, Exxon, the SOPA, ACTA, CISPA-sponsoring US Chamber of Commerce, and America’s warmongering Neo-Con establishment care about promoting democracy in Malaysia? Or in expanding their corporate-financier interests in Asia under the guise of promoting democracy? Clearly the latter.
The NDI, which Bersih leader Ambiga Sreenevasan herself admits funds her organization, is likewise chaired by an unsavory collection of corporate interests.
The average Malaysian, disenfranchised with the ruling government as they may be, cannot possibly believe these people are funding and propping up clearly disingenuous NGOs in direct support of a compromised Anwar Ibrahim, for the best interests of Malaysia.The end game for the US with an Anwar Ibrahim/People’s Alliance-led government, is a Malaysia that capitulates to both US free trade schemes and US foreign policy. In Malaysia’s case, this will leave the extensive economic independence achieved since escaping out from under British rule, gutted, while the nation’s resources are steered away from domestic development and toward a proxy confrontation with China, just as is already being done in Korea, Japan, and the Philippines.
Stitching ASEAN Together with Proxy Regimes to Fight China
Stitching ASEAN Together with Proxy Regimes to Fight China
Image: Lemuel Gulliver on the island of Lilliput, having been overtaken while asleep by ropes and stakes by the diminutive but numerous Lilliputians. Western corporate-financier interests envision organizing Southeast Asia into a supranational bloc, ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations), to use the smaller nations as a combined front to “tie down” China in a similar manner. Unlike in the story “Gulliver’s Travels,” China may well break free of its binds and stomp the Lilliputian leaders flat for their belligerence.
….
That the US goal is to use Malaysia and other Southeast Asian nations against China is not merely speculation. It is the foundation of a long-documented conspiracy dating back as far as 1997, and reaffirmed by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as recently as 2011.
In 1997, Fortune 500-funded (page 19) Brookings Institution policy scribe Robert Kagan penned, “What China Knows That We Don’t: The Case for a New Strategy of Containment,” which spells out the policy Wall Street and London were already in the process of implementing even then, albeit in a somewhat more nebulous manner. In his essay, Kagan literally states (emphasis added):
The present world order serves the needs of the United States and its allies, which constructed it. And it is poorly suited to the needs of a Chinese dictatorship trying to maintain power at home and increase its clout abroad. Chinese leaders chafe at the constraints on them and worry that they must change the rules of the international system before the international system changes them.
Here, Kagan openly admits that the “world order,” or the “international order,” is simply American-run global hegemony, dictated by US interests. These interests, it should be kept in mind, are not those of the American people, but of the immense corporate-financier interests of the Anglo-American establishment. Kagan continues (emphasis added):
In truth, the debate over whether we should or should not contain China is a bit silly. We are already containing China — not always consciously and not entirely successfully, but enough to annoy Chinese leaders and be an obstacle to their ambitions. When the Chinese used military maneuvers and ballistic-missile tests last March to intimidate Taiwanese voters, the United States responded by sending the Seventh Fleet. By this show of force, the U.S. demonstrated to Taiwan, Japan, and the rest of our Asian allies that our role as their defender in the region had not diminished as much as they might have feared. Thus, in response to a single Chinese exercise of muscle, the links of containment became visible and were tightened.
The new China hands insist that the United States needs to explain to the Chinese that its goal is merely, as [Robert] Zoellick writes, to avoid “the domination of East Asia by any power or group of powers hostile to the United States.” Our treaties with Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, and Australia, and our naval and military forces in the region, aim only at regional stability, not aggressive encirclement.
But the Chinese understand U.S. interests perfectly well, perhaps better than we do. While they welcome the U.S. presence as a check on Japan, the nation they fear most, they can see clearly that America’s military and diplomatic efforts in the region severely limit their own ability to become the region’s hegemon. According to Thomas J. Christensen, who spent several months interviewing Chinese military and civilian government analysts, Chinese leaders worry that they will “play Gulliver to Southeast Asia’s Lilliputians, with the United States supplying the rope and stakes.”
Indeed, the United States blocks Chinese ambitions merely by supporting what we like to call “international norms” of behavior. Christensen points out that Chinese strategic thinkers consider “complaints about China’s violations of international norms” to be part of “an integrated Western strategy, led by Washington, to prevent China from becoming a great power.
What Kagan is talking about is maintaining American preeminence across all of Asia and producing a strategy of tension to divide and limit the power of any single player vis-a-vis Wall Street and London’s hegemony. Kagan would continue (emphasis added):
The changes in the external and internal behavior of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s resulted at least in part from an American strategy that might be called “integration through containment and pressure for change.”
Such a strategy needs to be applied to China today. As long as China maintains its present form of government, it cannot be peacefully integrated into the international order. For China’s current leaders, it is too risky to play by our rules — yet our unwillingness to force them to play by our rules is too risky for the health of the international order. The United States cannot and should not be willing to upset the international order in the mistaken belief that accommodation is the best way to avoid a confrontation with China.
We should hold the line instead and work for political change in Beijing. That means strengthening our military capabilities in the region, improving our security ties with friends and allies, and making clear that we will respond, with force if necessary, when China uses military intimidation or aggression to achieve its regional ambitions. It also means not trading with the Chinese military or doing business with firms the military owns or operates. And it means imposing stiff sanctions when we catch China engaging in nuclear proliferation.
A successful containment strategy will require increasing, not decreasing, our overall defense capabilities. Eyre Crowe warned in 1907 that “the more we talk of the necessity of economising on our armaments, the more firmly will the Germans believe that we are tiring of the struggle, and that they will win by going on.” Today, the perception of our military decline is already shaping Chinese calculations. In 1992, an internal Chinese government document said that America’s “strength is in relative decline and that there are limits to what it can do.” This perception needs to be dispelled as quickly as possible.
Kagan’s talk of “responding” to China’s expansion is clearly manifested today in a series of proxy conflicts growing between US-backed Japan, and the US-backed Philippines, and to a lesser extent between North and South Korea, and even beginning to show in Myanmar. The governments of these nations have capitulated to US interests and their eagerness to play the role of America’s proxies in the region, even at their own cost, is not a surprise. To expand this, however, the US fully plans on integrating Southeast Asia, installing proxy regimes, and likewise turning their resources and people against China.
In 2011, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton unveiled the capstone to Kagan’s 1997 conspiracy. She published in Foreign Policy magazine, a piece titled, “America’s Pacific Century” where she explicitly states:
In the next 10 years, we need to be smart and systematic about where we invest time and energy, so that we put ourselves in the best position to sustain our leadership, secure our interests, and advance our values. One of the most important tasks of American statecraft over the next decade will therefore be to lock in a substantially increased investment — diplomatic, economic, strategic, and otherwise — in the Asia-Pacific region.
To “sustain our leadership,” “secure our interests,” and “advance our values,” are clearly hegemonic statements, and indicates that the US’ goal for “substantially increased investment,” including buying off NGOs and opposition parties in Malaysia, seeks to directly serve US leadership, interests, and “values,” not within US borders, but outside them, and specifically across all of Asia.
Clinton continues:
At a time when the region is building a more mature security and economic architecture to promote stability and prosperity, U.S. commitment there is essential. It will help build that architecture and pay dividends for continued American leadership well into this century, just as our post-World War II commitment to building a comprehensive and lasting transatlantic network of institutions and relationships has paid off many times over — and continues to do so.
The “architecture” referred to is the supranational ASEAN bloc – and again Clinton confirms that the US’ commitment to this process is designed not to lift up Asia, but to maintain its own hegemony across the region, and around the world.
Clinton then openly admits that the US seeks to exploit Asia’s economic growth:
Harnessing Asia’s growth and dynamism is central to American economic and strategic interests and a key priority for President Obama. Open markets in Asia provide the United States with unprecedented opportunities for investment, trade, and access to cutting-edge technology. Our economic recovery at home will depend on exports and the ability of American firms to tap into the vast and growing consumer base of Asia.
Of course, the purpose of an economy is to meet the needs of those who live within it. The Asian economy therefore ought to serve the needs and interests of Asians – not a hegemonic empire on the other side of the Pacific. Clinton’s piece could easily double as a declaration by England’s King George and his intentions toward emptying out the New World.
And no empire is complete without establishing a permanent military garrison on newly claimed territory. Clinton explains (emphasis added):
With this in mind, our work will proceed along six key lines of action: strengthening bilateral security alliances; deepening our working relationships with emerging powers, including with China; engaging with regional multilateral institutions; expanding trade and investment; forging a broad-based military presence; and advancing democracy and human rights.
And of course, by “advancing democracy and human rights,” Clinton means the continuation of funding faux-NGOs that disingenuously leverage human rights and democracy promotion to politically undermine targeted governments in pursuit of installing more obedient proxy regimes.
The piece is lengthy, and while a lot of readers may be tempted to gloss over some of the uglier, overtly imperial aspects of Clinton’s statement, the proof of America’s true intentions in Asia can be seen clearly manifested today, with the intentional encouragement of provocations between North and South Korea, an expanding confrontation between China and US proxies, Japan and the Philippines, and with mobs taking to the streets in Malaysia in hopes of overturning an election US-proxy Anwar Ibrahim had no chance of winning.
Clean & Fair Elections?
While the battle cry for Anwar Ibrahim, his People’s Alliance, and Bersih have been “clean and fair elections,” in reality, allegations of fraud began long before the elections even started. This was not because Anwar’s opposition party had evidence of such fraud – instead, this was to implant the idea into people’s minds long before the elections, deeply enough to justify claims of stolen elections no matter how the polls eventually turned out.
At one point during the elections, before ballots were even counted, Anwar Ibrahim declared victory - a move that analysts across the region noted was provocative, dangerous, and incredibly irresponsible. Again, there could not have been any evidence that Anwar won, because ballots had not yet been counted. It was again a move meant to manipulate the public and set the stage for contesting Anwar’s inevitable loss – in the streets with mobs and chaos in typical Western-backed color revolution style.
One must seriously ask themselves, considering Anwar’s foreign backers, those backers’ own stated intentions for Asia, and Anwar’s irresponsible, baseless claims before, during, and after the elections – what is “clean and fair” about any of this?
Anwar Ibrahim is a fraud, an overt proxy of foreign interests. His satellite NGOs, including the insidious Bersih movement openly funded by foreign corporate-financier interests, and the equally insidious polling NGO Merdeka who portrays itself as “independent” despite being funded directly by a foreign government, are likewise frauds – drawing in well-intentioned people through slick marketing, just as cigarette companies do.
And like cigarette companies who sell what is for millions essentially a slow, painful, humiliating death sentence that will leave one broken financially and spiritually before ultimately outright killing them, Anwar’s US-backed opposition is also selling Malaysia a slow, painful, humiliating death. Unfortunately, also like cigarettes, well-intentioned but impressionable people have not gathered all of the facts, and have instead have based their support on only the marketing, gimmicks, slogans, and tricks of a well-oiled, manipulative political machine.
For that folly, Malaysia may pay a heavy price one day – but for Anwar and his opposition party today, they have lost the elections, and the cheap veneer of America’s “democracy promotion” racket is quickly peeling away. For now, America has tripped in mid-pivot toward its hegemonic agenda in Asia, with Malaysia’s ruling government providing a model for other nations in the region to follow, should they be interested in sovereignty and independent progress – no matter how flawed or slow it may be.
SUMBER : http://www.globalresearch.ca/malaysia-failure-of-u-s-to-subvert-the-elections-and-install-a-proxy-regime/5334439
BLOG ABG
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
GAMBAR KENANGAN PERDANA MENTERI DAN BARISAN MENTERI KABINET SERTA TIMBALAN PADA 03/04/2013
Diambil pada Hari Pembubaran Parlimen ke 12 selepas Mesyuarat Terakhir Kabinet 03/04/2013