TERKINI !!! PEMBONGKARAN RAHSIA DAN SKANDAL ANWAR TERBESAR - JUSUF KALLA BERKAITAN KEJADIAN SEBENAR DI PRU13, BLACKOUT 505, TRAJEDI LAHAD DATU DAN PERJANJIAN MOU PRU13..........

WAWANCARA PENUH : JUSUF KALLA DEDAH PENGLIBATAN AMERIKA BANTU ANWAR JUMPA PRESIDEN INDONESIA!

Bapak Jusuf Kalla, Mantan Naib Presiden Indonesia

Nama bapak Jusuf Kalla (JK), mantan Naib Presiden Indonesia menjadi penting di Malaysia kerana peranan persahabatannya dalam PRU13 baru-baru ini. Ramai rakyat Malaysia terkejut bagaimana beliau tiba-tiba muncul dalam kancah politik Malaysia. Ikuti perbualan eksklusif saya dengan bapak Jusuf Kalla di Jakarta baru-baru ini yang turut memperkatakan pelbagai isu sampingan.

Sebagai Ketua Editor Merdeka-Online, sebuah portal baru yang saya usahakan dengan matlamat rakyat Malaysia boleh meresapi jiwa merdeka dengan semangat "a sense of belonging". Baru-baru ini, pada 1 Jun 2013 saya berkunjung ke rumah bapak Jusuf Kalla, di Jakarta, Indonesia dengan niat untuk bertemu bapak Jusuf Kalla sekiranya beliau boleh ditemuramah.

Alhamdulillah, bukan sahaja saya diterima dengan baik oleh bapak Jusuf kalla, tetapi saya turut dapat berbicara pelbagai hal khususnya mengenai Pilihanraya Umum Ke-13 di Malaysia. Ikuti sedutan soal-jawab saya dengan bapak Jusuf kalla.

MO: Assalamualaikum dan terima kasih saya ucap kepada Bapak atas kesudian menerima kehadiran saya.

JK: Waalaikum Salam warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh. Terima kasih.

MO: Saya ingin menyatakan perasaan teruja atas peranan bapak dalam hal, kalau bisa disebut perdamaian semasa Pilihanraya Umum di Malaysia baru-baru ini. Saya dapati rata-rata rakyat Malaysia masih tertanya-tanya bagaimana bapak tiba-tiba bisa muncul dalam hal ini?

JK: Sebetulnya, saya ingin jelaskan bahawa bapak Anwar bertemu saya sebanyak 3 kali. Pertamanya pada bulan Mac, 2013 di rumah ini juga dia datang pada malam hari. Ketika itu, hadir bersama dua ahli Parlimen Indoneisa iaitu Yusril Ihza Mahendra dan Fahmi Idris.

Saya lihat, pada ketika itu, Anwar terlalu yakin akan menang Pilihanraya di Malaysia, kerana katanya di mana-mana dia pergi sambutannya cukup luar biasa.

Jadi Anwar mahu saya jadi perantaraan kepada bapak Najib, karena hubungan saya dengan kedua-dua mereka ini sangat baik, maka atas dasar persahabatan saya menerima. Bukan saya mahu masuk campur dalam urusan negara Malaysia, saya menerima urusan ini sebagai urusan persahabatan saya.

MO: Barangkali bapa bisa jelaskan apakah permintaan bapak Anwar semasa pertemuan dengan bapak tempohari?

JK: Anwar memang ada membuat beberapa permintaan supaya saya bisa sampaikan kepada bapak Najib. Pertamanya, Anwar mahu agar supaya bapak Najib menerima ketetapan bahawa sesiapa yang kalah hendaklah menerima kekalahan itu. Dan yang kalah juga hendaklah mengucapkan selamat berjaya kepada yang menang, dan yang kalah itu kalau bisa disesuaikan dalam pentadbiran kerajaan yang baru.

Jadi, saya terbang ke Kuala Lumpur dan menyampaikan permintaan-permintaan Anwar itu dan bapak Najib mendengar dengan baik.

Saya lihat bapak Najib seorang yang berjiwa besar, mendengar dengan baik segala permintaan Anwar tetapi bapak Najib juga mempunyai keyakinan yang tinggi akan menang Pilihanraya itu.

MO: Bagaimana tentang hal perjanjian, kerana di Malaysia heboh kononnya ada surat perjanjian antara Anwar dengan bapak Najib?

JK: Anwar memang ada membuat perjanjian bertulis. Anwar yang membuatnya, jadi semasa Anwar datang ke rumah saya, Anwar mahu supaya bapak Najib menurunkan tandatangan dalam perjanjian itu.

Anwar sangat konfiden akan menang. Di dalam mindanya dia sudah bayangkan dia Perdana Menteri. Jadi, saya kata kepada Anwar ok, kalau kamu kalah kamu juga harus menerima kekalahan kamu. Anwar bersetuju, jadi saya tandatangan dan Anwar juga tandatangan.

Apabila saya terbang ke Kuala Lumpur, saya bawa hal surat perjanjian ini kepada bapak Najib, saya melihat bapak Najib tidak ada masalah melihat perjanjian itu, tapi bapak Najib mengambil keputusan tidak menurunkan tandatangan. Saya tidak bisa memaksa.

Jadi saya balik semula kepada Anwar, saya beritahu kepada Anwar bahawa bapak Najib tidak turunkan tandatangan tetapi saya mahu kamu (Anwar) percaya kepada my mouth (mulut saya) bahawa bapak Najib tidak ada halangan dengan permintaan kamu (Anwar) itu. Maknanya, sesiapa yang kalah harus menerima kekalahan dengan hati yang terbuka (gentleman).

Inilah gentleman's agreement antara saya dengan bapak Najib. Akhirnya Anwar bersetuju dalam isu bapak Najib tidak turunkan tandatangan karena Anwar mempercayai cakap saya.

Malangnya, selepas keputusan Pilihanraya, Anwar mungkir janji dan tidak komited kepada perjanjian itu sendiri. Itu sebab saya marah kepada Anwar dan kawan-kawan Anwar di Jakarta turut marah kepadanya kerana Anwar mungkir janji dan tidak komited. Asean Wall Street Journal menghub ungi saya bertanya apakah benar Anwar tidak komted. Saya beritahu mereka ya, benar Anwar memang tidak komited.

Saya tidak akan hubungi Anwar, biar dia tahu kami (Yusril, Fatmi dan teman-teman yang lain) marah kepadanya.

ISU PENIPUAN PILIHANRAYA

MO: Apa alasan Anwar tidak mahu menerima kekalahannya, mungkir janji dan tidak komited?

JK: Anwar menuduh berlaku penipuan, antaranya soal dakwat kekal. Jadi saya marah Anwar, saya kata kamu bilang dakwat itu tidak kekal, itu kamu lihat di jari kamu masih ada bekas dakwat kekal belum hilang (sambil bapak Jusuf Kalla memegang jari Anwar yang masih ada bekas dakwat).

Kemudian Anwar bangkitkan pengundi Bangladesh. Saya bilang sama Anwar, tak kan orang Malaysia tidak boleh membezakan percakapan, bahasa, budaya dan gaya orang Bangladesh. Tidak mungkin berpuluh ribu orang Bangladesh boleh dibawa masuk ke Malaysia dan menjadi pengundi. Ini tidak masuk akal.

Tapi, Anwar tetap tidak mahu menerima keputusan dan dia tetap dengan egonya.

MO: Anwar kata dia menang kerana undi popular dia lebih banyak daripada bapak Najib?

JK: Saya beritahu Anwar, kamu berada di Malaysia bukannya di Indonesia. Kalau kamu (Anwar) bertanding di Indonesia kamu sudah jadi Presiden Indonesia. Tapi di Malaysia sistemnya lain, kemenangannya dikira melalui sistem undi electoral, yang mana partai yang menang akan membentuk kerajaan dan melantik Perdana Menteri.

Malangnya Anwar ini ego, imaginasinya sangat melampau-lampau, dia tetap mahu jadi Perdana Menteri. Saya bilang kepada Anwar, "Kamu sudah gila?" mana mungkin kamu (Anwar) menjadi Perdana Menteri sedangkan kamu hanya menang 89 kerusi parlimen walhal bapak Najib menang 133. Tolong beri saya jawapan atas dasar apa kamu boleh jadi Perdana Menteri kerana kamu sendiri tahu kamu hanya menang 89 walhal bapak Najib menang 133.

Kami bertengkar dan akhirnya Anwar berfikir juga. Kemudian, kami juga berbicara tentang masa depannya dan masa depan Nurul Izzah. Saya bercakap tentang Menteri Penuh, Anwar meminta masa berfikir tentang perkara itu.

Kesilapan Anwar ialah dia sudah dua kali mengumumkan mahu bersara jika tewas dalam Pilihanraya, malangnya Anwar tidak pernah komited kepada janji-janjinya.

HIMPUNAN BLACK OUT 505

MO: Anwar kini sedang mengadakan himpunan Black Out 505 di seluruh negara sebagai bantahan ke atas keputusan Pilihanraya Umum baru-baru ini. Bagaimana bapak melihat perkara ini?

JK: Pertama saya mahu beritahu bahawa saya mengetahui Anwar dibantu oleh beberapa pihak khususnya dari Turki, Washington, Filipina, dan mungkin juga di negara Thai dan China, itu kamu kena selidiki. Pemberi dana yang besar itu dari sebuah syarikat besar di Filipina, dan sedikit-sedikit dari Turki untuk membantu aktiviti himpunan bantahan itu. Mereka tidak boleh menyembunyikan diri mereka kerana mereka adalah rakan-rakan bisnes yang kita ketahui siapa mereka.

Isunya untuk apa membuat himpunan tersebut jika ianya hanya memberi keuntungan kepada musuh-musuh Islam dan orang Melayu. Saya sendiri bertanya kepada Anwar, apakah kamu boleh mengontrol (mengawal) parti DAP? Anwar terdiam dan Anwar tidak dapat memberi jawapan dengan jelas, ternyata Anwar punya masalah dan kepayahan untuk mengawal ahli-ahli parlimen dari parti lain.

Makanya, saya sendiri berfikiran tindakan Anwar mengadakan himpunan Black Out 505 itu hanya sia-sia sahaja, melainkan hanya menguntungkan sebelah pihak sahaja iaitu musuh-musuh Islam.

PERTEMUAN SUSILO & ELEMEN WASHINGTON

JK: Baru-baru ini Presiden Susilo menelefon saya bertanyakan mengenai panggilan telefon dari "Polis Washington" supaya Presiden Susilo menerima permintaan Anwar untuk bertemu dengannya. Saya memberitahu Presiden Susilo supaya tidak tunduk kepada tekanan Washington dan tidak kena dengan peraturan kenegaraan untuk menerima permintaan Anwar kerana Anwar hanya pembangkang bukan Perdana Menteri. Ini bermakna, saya sangat yakin, bahawa ada elemen Washington dalam urusan campurtangan kuasa luar dalam politik negara Malaysia. Anda perlu terus menyiasat perkara ini.

ISU PENCEROBOHAN LAHAD DATU

JK: Dalam kes pencerobohan Lahad Datu, saya juga tahu bahawa ada campurtangan dari orang-orang tertentu di Filipina, kawan-kawan Anwar seperti Joseph Estrada dan sebuah syarikat besar di Filipina memberi sokongan kewangan dalam kes pencerobohan di Lahad Datu.
Tujuan mereka satu sahaja iaitu untuk melemahkan kerajaan Malaysia, di mana mereka yang menceroboh itu mahu menunjukkan kepada dunia luar bahawa kerajaan Malaysia lemah dan gagal menangani isu tersebut.

MO: Saya ucap terimakasih kepada bapak atas kesudian bapak menerima kehadiran saya dan seterusnya berbicara tentang isu penting ini. Saya sangat hargai dan saya berharap rakyat Malaysia boleh melihat peranan bapak yang mulia ini khususnya kedua-duanya adalah sahabat baik bapak.
JK: Terima kasih.

Jakarta, Indonesia,
1 Jun 2013

Juragan Malawati..
Sumber  :  http://umno-kselangor.blogspot.com/2013/06/wawancara-penuh-jusuf-kalla-dedah.html


ADMIN - Respect Bro.........SALUTE !!
BLOG ABG

SUDAH TERANG LAGI BERSULUH : Penglibatan Asing di belakang PKR dan BERSIH !!! KEMENANGAN 2-0 BUAT MALAYSIA !!! (Menyekat kemaraan pengaruh BERSIH dan mengalahkan Pakatan Rakyat di dalam PRU13 ) - Syabas buat PM Najib Razak !!

Malaysia: Failure of U.S. to Subvert the Elections and Install a “Proxy Regime”

US "Pivot" Toward Asia Trips in Malaysia

By Tony Cartalucci

Global Research, May 09, 2013

 Wall Street and London’s hegemonic ambitions in Asia, centered around installing proxy regimes across Southeast Asia and using the supranational ASEAN bloc to encircle and contain China, suffered a serious blow this week when Western-proxy and Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim’s party lost in general elections.While Anwar Ibrahim’s opposition party, Pakatan Rakyat (PR) or “People’s Alliance,” attempted to run on an anti-corruption platform, its campaign instead resembled verbatim attempts by the West to subvert governments politically around the world, including most recently in Venezuela, and in Russia in 2012.Just as in Russia where so-called “independent” election monitor GOLOS turned out to be fully funded by the US State Department through the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), Malaysia’s so-called election monitor, the Merdeka Center for Opinion Research, is likewise funded directly by the US through NED. Despite this, Western media outlets, in pursuit of promoting the Western-backed People’s Alliance, has repeatedly referred to Merdeka as “independent.”

Image: Despite the US mobilizing the summation of its media power and pouring millions of dollars into the opposition party, including the creation and perpetuation of fake-NGOs such as Bersih and the Merdeka Center, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak sailed to a comfortable victory in this year’s general elections. The cheap veneer has begun peeling away from America’s “democracy promotion” racket, leaving its proxies exposed and frantic, and America’s hegemonic ambitions across Asia in serious question. 

The BBC in its article, “Malaysia election sees record turnout,” lays out the well-rehearsed cries of “stolen elections” used by the West to undermine the legitimacy of polls it fears its proxy candidates may lose – with  the US-funded Merdeka Center cited in attempts to bolster these claims. Their foreign funding and compromised objectivity is never mentioned (emphasis added) :

Allegations of election fraud surfaced before the election. Some of those who voted in advance told BBC News that indelible ink – supposed to last for days – easily washed off.

“The indelible ink can be washed off easily, with just water, in a few seconds,” one voter, Lo, told BBC News from Skudai.

Another voter wrote: “Marked with “indelible ink” and voted at 10:00. Have already cleaned off the ink by 12:00. If I was also registered under a different name and ID number at a neighbouring constituency, I would be able to vote again before 17:00!”

The opposition has also accused the government of funding flights for supporters to key states, which the government denies.

Independent pollster Merdeka Center has received unconfirmed reports of foreign nationals being given IDs and allowed to vote.

However, an election monitoring organization funded by a foreign government which openly seeks to remove the current ruling party from Malaysia in favor of long-time Wall Street servant Anwar Ibrahim is most certainly not “independent.”

The ties between Anwar Ibrahim’s “People’s Alliance” and the US State Department don’t end with the Merdeka Center, but continue into the opposition’s street movement, “Bersih.” Claiming to fight for “clean and fair” elections, Bersih in reality is a vehicle designed to mobilize street protests on behalf of Anwar’s opposition party. Bersih’s alleged leader, Ambiga Sreenevasan, has admitted herself that her organization has received cash directly from the United States via the National Endowment for Democracy’s National Democratic Institute (NDI), and convicted criminal George Soros’ Open Society.

The Malaysian Insider reported on June 27, 2011 that Bersih leader Ambiga Sreenevassan:

“…admitted to Bersih receiving some money from two US organisations — the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and Open Society Institute (OSI) — for other projects, which she stressed were unrelated to the July 9 march.”

A visit to the NDI website revealed indeed that funding and training had been provided by the US organization – before NDI took down the information and replaced it with a more benign version purged entirely of any mention of Bersih. For funding Ambiga claims is innocuous, the NDI’s rushed obfuscation of any ties to her organization suggests something far more sinister at play.

Photo: NDI’s website before taking down any mention to Malaysia’s Bersih movement. (click image to enlarge)

….

The substantial, yet carefully obfuscated support the West has lent Anwar should be of no surprise to those familiar with Anwar’s history. That Anwar Ibrahim himself was Chairman of the Development Committee of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 1998, held lecturing positions at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, was a consultant to the World Bank, and a panelist at the Neo-Con lined National Endowment for Democracy’s “Democracy Award” and a panelist at a NED donation ceremony – the very same US organization funding and supporting Bersih and so-called “independent” election monitor Merdeka – paints a picture of an opposition running for office in Malaysia, not for the Malaysian people, but clearly for the corporate financier interests of Wall Street and London.

Photo: Taken from the US National Endowment for Democracy’s 2007 Democracy Award eventheld in Washington D.C., Anwar Ibrahim can be seen to the far left and participated as a “panelist.” It is no surprise that NED is now subsidizing his bid to worm his way back into power in Malaysia. (click image to enlarge)

….

In reality, Bersih’s leadership along with Anwar and their host of foreign sponsors are attempting to galvanize the very real grievances of the Malaysian people and exploit them to propel themselves into power. While many may be tempted to suggest that “clean and fair elections” truly are Bersih and Anwar’s goal, and that US funding via NED’s NDI  are entirely innocuous, a thorough examination of these organizations, how they operate, and their admitted agenda reveals the proverbial cliff Anwar and Bersih are leading their followers and the nation of Malaysia over.

As Bersih predictably mobilizes in the streets on behalf of Anwar’s opposition party in the wake of their collective failure during Malaysia’s 2013 general elections, it is important for Malaysians to understand the true nature of the Western organizations funding their attempts to politically undermine the ruling party and divide Malaysians against each other, and exactly why this is being done in the greater context of US hegemony in Asia.

Anwar & Bersih’s US State Department Backers

The US State Department’s NED and NDI are most certainly not benevolent promoters of democracy and freedom.Does Boeing, Goldman Sachs, Exxon, the SOPA, ACTA, CISPA-sponsoring US Chamber of Commerce, and America’s warmongering Neo-Con establishment care about promoting democracy in Malaysia? Or in expanding their corporate-financier interests in Asia under the guise of promoting democracy? Clearly the latter.

The NDI, which Bersih leader Ambiga Sreenevasan herself admits funds her organization, is likewise chaired by an unsavory collection of corporate interests.

The average Malaysian, disenfranchised with the ruling government as they may be, cannot possibly believe these people are funding and propping up clearly disingenuous NGOs in direct support of a compromised Anwar Ibrahim, for the best interests of Malaysia.The end game for the US with an Anwar Ibrahim/People’s Alliance-led government, is a Malaysia that capitulates to both US free trade schemes and US foreign policy. In Malaysia’s case, this will leave the extensive economic independence achieved since escaping out from under British rule, gutted, while the nation’s resources are steered away from domestic development and toward a proxy confrontation with China, just as is already being done in Korea, Japan, and the Philippines.

Stitching ASEAN Together with Proxy Regimes to Fight China 

Image: Lemuel Gulliver on the island of Lilliput, having been overtaken while asleep by ropes and stakes by the diminutive but numerous Lilliputians. Western corporate-financier interests envision organizing Southeast Asia into a supranational bloc, ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations), to use the smaller nations as a combined front to “tie down” China in a similar manner. Unlike in the story “Gulliver’s Travels,” China may well break free of its binds and stomp the Lilliputian leaders flat for their belligerence. 

….

That the US goal is to use Malaysia and other Southeast Asian nations against China is not merely speculation. It is the foundation of a long-documented conspiracy dating back as far as 1997, and reaffirmed by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as recently as 2011.

In 1997,  Fortune 500-funded (page 19) Brookings Institution policy scribe Robert Kagan penned, “What China Knows That We Don’t: The Case for a New Strategy of Containment,” which spells out the policy Wall Street and London were already in the process of implementing even then, albeit in a somewhat more nebulous manner. In his essay, Kagan literally states (emphasis added):

The present world order serves the needs of the United States and its allies, which constructed it. And it is poorly suited to the needs of a Chinese dictatorship trying to maintain power at home and increase its clout abroad. Chinese leaders chafe at the constraints on them and worry that they must change the rules of the international system before the international system changes them.

Here, Kagan openly admits that the “world order,” or the “international order,” is simply American-run global hegemony, dictated by US interests. These interests, it should be kept in mind, are not those of the American people, but of the immense corporate-financier interests of the Anglo-American establishment. Kagan continues (emphasis added):

In truth, the debate over whether we should or should not contain China is a bit silly. We are already containing China — not always consciously and not entirely successfully, but enough to annoy Chinese leaders and be an obstacle to their ambitions. When the Chinese used military maneuvers and ballistic-missile tests last March to intimidate Taiwanese voters, the United States responded by sending the Seventh Fleet. By this show of force, the U.S. demonstrated to Taiwan, Japan, and the rest of our Asian allies that our role as their defender in the region had not diminished as much as they might have feared. Thus, in response to a single Chinese exercise of muscle, the links of containment became visible and were tightened.

The new China hands insist that the United States needs to explain to the Chinese that its goal is merely, as [Robert] Zoellick writes, to avoid “the domination of East Asia by any power or group of powers hostile to the United States.” Our treaties with Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, and Australia, and our naval and military forces in the region, aim only at regional stability, not aggressive encirclement.

But the Chinese understand U.S. interests perfectly well, perhaps better than we do. While they welcome the U.S. presence as a check on Japan, the nation they fear most, they can see clearly that America’s military and diplomatic efforts in the region severely limit their own ability to become the region’s hegemon. According to Thomas J. Christensen, who spent several months interviewing Chinese military and civilian government analysts, Chinese leaders worry that they will “play Gulliver to Southeast Asia’s Lilliputians, with the United States supplying the rope and stakes.”

Indeed, the United States blocks Chinese ambitions merely by supporting what we like to call “international norms” of behavior. Christensen points out that Chinese strategic thinkers consider “complaints about China’s violations of international norms” to be part of “an integrated Western strategy, led by Washington, to prevent China from becoming a great power.

What Kagan is talking about is maintaining American preeminence across all of Asia and producing a strategy of tension to divide and limit the power of any single player vis-a-vis Wall Street and London’s hegemony. Kagan would continue (emphasis added):

The changes in the external and internal behavior of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s resulted at least in part from an American strategy that might be called “integration through containment and pressure for change.”

Such a strategy needs to be applied to China today. As long as China maintains its present form of government, it cannot be peacefully integrated into the international order. For China’s current leaders, it is too risky to play by our rules — yet our unwillingness to force them to play by our rules is too risky for the health of the international order. The United States cannot and should not be willing to upset the international order in the mistaken belief that accommodation is the best way to avoid a confrontation with China.

We should hold the line instead and work for political change in Beijing. That means strengthening our military capabilities in the region, improving our security ties with friends and allies, and making clear that we will respond, with force if necessary, when China uses military intimidation or aggression to achieve its regional ambitions. It also means not trading with the Chinese military or doing business with firms the military owns or operates. And it means imposing stiff sanctions when we catch China engaging in nuclear proliferation.

A successful containment strategy will require increasing, not decreasing, our overall defense capabilities. Eyre Crowe warned in 1907 that “the more we talk of the necessity of economising on our armaments, the more firmly will the Germans believe that we are tiring of the struggle, and that they will win by going on.” Today, the perception of our military decline is already shaping Chinese calculations. In 1992, an internal Chinese government document said that America’s “strength is in relative decline and that there are limits to what it can do.” This perception needs to be dispelled as quickly as possible.

Kagan’s talk of “responding” to China’s expansion is clearly manifested today in a series of proxy conflicts growing between US-backed Japan, and the US-backed Philippines, and to a lesser extent between North and South Korea, and even beginning to show in Myanmar. The governments of these nations have capitulated to US interests and their eagerness to play the role of America’s proxies in the region, even at their own cost, is not a surprise. To expand this, however, the US fully plans on integrating Southeast Asia, installing proxy regimes, and likewise turning their resources and people against China.

In 2011, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton unveiled the capstone to Kagan’s 1997 conspiracy. She published in Foreign Policy magazine, a piece titled, “America’s Pacific Century” where she explicitly states:

In the next 10 years, we need to be smart and systematic about where we invest time and energy, so that we put ourselves in the best position to sustain our leadership, secure our interests, and advance our values. One of the most important tasks of American statecraft over the next decade will therefore be to lock in a substantially increased investment — diplomatic, economic, strategic, and otherwise — in the Asia-Pacific region.

To “sustain our leadership,” “secure our interests,” and “advance our values,” are clearly hegemonic statements, and indicates that the US’ goal for “substantially increased investment,” including buying off NGOs and opposition parties in Malaysia, seeks to directly serve US leadership, interests, and “values,”  not within US borders, but outside them, and specifically across all of Asia.

Clinton continues:

At a time when the region is building a more mature security and economic architecture to promote stability and prosperity, U.S. commitment there is essential. It will help build that architecture and pay dividends for continued American leadership well into this century, just as our post-World War II commitment to building a comprehensive and lasting transatlantic network of institutions and relationships has paid off many times over — and continues to do so.

The “architecture” referred to is the supranational ASEAN bloc – and again Clinton confirms that the US’ commitment to this process is designed not to lift up Asia, but to maintain its own hegemony across the region, and around the world.

Clinton then openly admits that the US seeks to exploit Asia’s economic growth:

Harnessing Asia’s growth and dynamism is central to American economic and strategic interests and a key priority for President Obama. Open markets in Asia provide the United States with unprecedented opportunities for investment, trade, and access to cutting-edge technology. Our economic recovery at home will depend on exports and the ability of American firms to tap into the vast and growing consumer base of Asia.

Of course, the purpose of an economy is to meet the needs of those who live within it. The Asian economy therefore ought to serve the needs and interests of Asians – not a hegemonic empire on the other side of the Pacific. Clinton’s piece could easily double as a declaration by England’s King George and his intentions toward emptying out the New World.

And no empire is complete without establishing a permanent military garrison on newly claimed territory. Clinton explains (emphasis added):

With this in mind, our work will proceed along six key lines of action: strengthening bilateral security alliances; deepening our working relationships with emerging powers, including with China; engaging with regional multilateral institutions; expanding trade and investment; forging a broad-based military presence; and advancing democracy and human rights.

And of course, by “advancing democracy and human rights,” Clinton means the continuation of funding faux-NGOs that disingenuously leverage human rights and democracy promotion to politically undermine targeted governments in pursuit of installing more obedient proxy regimes.

The piece is lengthy, and while a lot of readers may be tempted to gloss over some of the uglier, overtly imperial aspects of Clinton’s statement, the proof of America’s true intentions in Asia can be seen clearly manifested today, with the intentional encouragement of provocations between North and South Korea, an expanding confrontation between China and US proxies, Japan and the Philippines, and with mobs taking to the streets in Malaysia in hopes of overturning an election US-proxy Anwar Ibrahim had no chance of winning.

Clean & Fair Elections?

While the battle cry for Anwar Ibrahim, his People’s Alliance, and Bersih have been “clean and fair elections,” in reality, allegations of fraud began long before the elections even started. This was not because Anwar’s opposition party had evidence of such fraud – instead, this was to implant the idea into people’s minds long before the elections, deeply enough to justify claims of stolen elections no matter how the polls eventually turned out.

At one point during the elections, before ballots were even counted, Anwar Ibrahim declared victory - a move that analysts across the region noted was provocative, dangerous, and incredibly irresponsible. Again, there could not have been any evidence that Anwar won, because ballots had not yet been counted. It was again a move meant to manipulate the public and set the stage for contesting Anwar’s inevitable loss – in the streets with mobs and chaos in typical Western-backed color revolution style.

One must seriously ask themselves, considering Anwar’s foreign backers, those backers’ own stated intentions for Asia, and Anwar’s irresponsible, baseless claims before, during, and after the elections – what is “clean and fair” about any of this?

Anwar Ibrahim is a fraud, an overt proxy of foreign interests. His satellite NGOs, including the insidious Bersih movement openly funded by foreign corporate-financier interests, and the equally insidious polling NGO Merdeka who portrays itself as “independent” despite being funded directly by a foreign government, are likewise frauds – drawing in well-intentioned people through slick marketing, just as cigarette companies do.

And like cigarette companies who sell what is for millions essentially a slow, painful, humiliating death sentence that will leave one broken financially and spiritually before ultimately outright killing them, Anwar’s US-backed opposition is also selling Malaysia a slow, painful, humiliating death. Unfortunately, also like cigarettes, well-intentioned but impressionable people have not gathered all of the facts, and have instead have based their support on only the marketing, gimmicks, slogans, and tricks of a well-oiled, manipulative political machine.

For that folly, Malaysia may pay a heavy price one day – but for Anwar and his opposition party today, they have lost the elections, and the cheap veneer of America’s “democracy promotion” racket is quickly peeling away. For now, America has tripped in mid-pivot toward its hegemonic agenda in Asia, with Malaysia’s ruling government providing a model for other nations in the region to follow, should they be interested in sovereignty and independent progress – no matter how flawed or slow it may be.

SUMBER : http://www.globalresearch.ca/malaysia-failure-of-u-s-to-subvert-the-elections-and-install-a-proxy-regime/5334439

BLOG ABG

SATU LAGI BENTUK PROVOKASI PAKATAN HARAM MENGGANGGU GUGAT KESTABILAN DAN KESELAMATAN NEGARA !!!

SATU LAGI DOKUMEN SULIT PAKATAN PEMBANGKANG TERBONGKAR! #PRU13

Bekas Naib Presiden DAP, Tunku Abdul Aziz Tunku Ibrahim hari ini tampil mengemukakan bukti wujudnya perancangan untuk menimbulkan kekacauan pada Pilihan Raya Umum ke-13 (PRU13) yang dikatakan akan didalangi oleh PKR dan BERSIH.

Menurut beliau, maklumat serta dokumen yang diterimanya menunjukkan terdapatnya satu strategi licik untuk menggangu kelancaran pilihan raya dengan mencetuskan kekacauan yang akan menjejaskan imej dan integriti Suruhanjaya Pilihanraya (SPR) di mata umum.

"Kami telah menerima maklumat gangguan tertentu dan dokumen berkaitan yang menunjukkan terdapat rancangan jahat pihak tertentu pada hari mengundi PRU13 yang akan datang.

"Maklumat dan dokumen ini mendedahkan suatu strategi licik untuk mengganggu PRU13 dengan mencetuskan kekacauan dan akibatnya merosakkan imej SPR untuk melemahkan keyakinan umum terhadap integriti proses pengundian demokrasi kita," katanya pada satu sidang media di Hotel Eastin, Petaling Jaya.

Tunku Aziz berkata pihaknya difahamkan terdapat agen-agen yang menerima latihan daripada sebuah pertubuhan bukan kerajaan (NGO), Tindak Malaysia untuk mencetuskan kekecohan itu.

“Kami difahamkan yang sesi latihan telah diberikan kepada Agen Mengundi, Agen Pengiraan Undi dan Agen Booth/Barong, dikenali sebagai PACABA, oleh sebuah NGO digelar Tindak Malaysia.

"Salah satu aspek khas sesi latihan ini ialah berkaitan dengan mengajar pengundi bagaimana untuk menjaga kesulitan undi mereka iaitu dengan memohon supaya kertas undi mereka ditukar kepada kertas yang lain," ujarnya lagi.

Jika permintaan pengundi itu ditolak oleh Ketua Tempat Mengundi (KTM), agen undi yang bertugas pada hari tersebut diajar untuk menyokong permintaan tersebut dan memberikan tekanan terhadap KTM.

“Orang yang menghadiri latihan tersebut diajar untuk menjadi lebih vokal dan berani untuk mencabar kerani yang bertugas dan juga KTM dengan menyatakan ianya satu kesalahan pilihan raya sekiranya mereka enggan melayan permintaan pengundi.

“Agen undi yang bertugas itu juga telah dilatih untuk menyokong permintaan seumpama ini oleh pengundi dan membuat bantahan terhadap KTM yang akan membantu memberi tekanan kepada KTM,” jelas beliau.

Semua ini kata Tunku Aziz, direka semata-mata untuk mencipta pandangan negatif terhadap SPR dengan membangkitkan kemarahan umum.

Tunku Aziz turut menampilkan bersamanya satu dokumen berkepala surat PKR bertarikh 15 Disember 2012 yang menyenaraikan pelbagai langkah untuk mencetuskan kekecohan dan ketidakpuasan terhadap SPR pada hari pengundian.

Video : Penjelasan Tunku Aziz

Video : penjelasan Tunku Aziz

Langkah-langkah yang dinyatakan di dalam dokumen tersebut adalah seperti berikut:

- Wujudkan kekecohan di Pusat Mengundi. Cuba dengan sebaik mungkin untuk orang ramai berasa kurang senang dan kecewa dengan kelemahan pengurusan.

- Wujudkan kumpulan pengundi yang melakukan kekecohan. Protes sebanyak mungkin walaupun nampak remeh, tetapi wujudkan rasa benci pengundi kepada SPR.

- Ejen kita di dalam tempat mengundi juga perlu melakukan protes sejak awal pagi.

- Pastikan barisan mengundi menjadi panjang dan tidak terkawal.

- Beri tekanan berterusan kepada KTM (mereka hanyalah kalangan guru yang bekerja sementara untuk SPR – sebahagian besar adalah penyokong kuat kita).

Kawasan Parlimen yang ditumpukan untuk kekecohan ialah Gombak, Lembah Pantai, Permatang Pauh, Setiawangsa, Wangsa Maju, Bagan Serai, Bukit Katil, Muar, Pandan dan Sabak Bernam di mana unit media baru mereka akan membangkitkan kemarahan menggunakan media baru.

Sehubungan itu, Tunku Aziz mencabar pemimpin-pemimpin setiap parti politik di negara ini menandatangani deklarasi umum menyatakan ikrar mereka untuk tidak akan terlibat dengan sebarang kekecohan semasa PRU13 berlangsung 5 Mei depan.

“Kami mencabar semua parti politik yang bakal menyertai pilihanraya untuk menandatangani deklarasi umum bahawa mereka tidak akan dalam sebarang keadaan sama ada secara langsung atau tidak terlibat dalam sebarang tindakan untuk mengganggu proses pengundian pada hari mengundi.

“Hari ini kami akan menghantar jemputan kepada Pengerusi Barisan Nasional (BN) atau wakil beliau, Presiden PAS atau wakil beliau, Pengerusi DAP atau wakil beliau dan Presiden PKR atau wakil beliau untuk upacara menandatangani deklarasi tersebut pada hari Sabtu, 13 April pada pukul 11 pagi di Eastin Hotel, Petaling Jaya,” katanya. - AntaraPos

ADMIN - MEMANG CELAKA PAKATAN HARAM NI !!!

BLOG ABG

UCAPAN YAB PERDANA MENTERI DATO' SERI MOHD NAJIB TUN RAZAK SEMASA PENGUMUMAN PEMBUBARAN PARLIMEN JAM 10.30 PAGI 3 APRIL 2013

UCAPAN
YAB DATO’ SRI MOHD NAJIB BIN TUN ABD RAZAK
PERDANA MENTERI MALAYSIA
SEMPENA PEMBUBARAN PARLIMEN KE-13
PADA 03HB APRIL 2013 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bismillahirrahmanirrahim,
Assalamualaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh,
Salam Sejahtera dan Salam 1Malaysia
Rakyat Malaysia yang dikasihi,

1. Pertama-tamanya marilah kita memanjatkan rasa syukur ke
hadrat Allah SWT kerana dengan izin dan rahmatnya saya
dan Timbalan Perdana Menteri dapat bersama-sama secara
langsung dengan Tuan-tuan dan Puan-puan sekalian pada
pagi ini.

2. Saya ingin memaklumkan kepada rakyat Malaysia bahawa
pada pagi ini saya telah pun menghadap Seri Paduka
Baginda Yang DiPertuan Agong dan menyembah warkah
kepada Baginda memohon perkenan supaya Parlimen ke-12
dibubarkan pada hari ini Rabu, 3 April 2013. Sehubungan
dengan itu selaras dengan peruntukan Perlembagaan
Persekutuan baginda telah pun memperkenankan bagi
Parlimen Ke-12 dibubarkan berkuat kuasa hari ini.

3. Sehubungan dengan itu saya menasihatkan kepada ketuaketua kerajaan negeri yang berkenaan untuk menghadap ...........

( Seterusnya BACA -

http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v7/bm/pdf/bubar_parlimen_2013.pdf )



BLOG ABG

PARLIMEN KE 12 BUBAR ; PILIHANRAYA PERLU DIADAKAN DALAM TEMPOH 60 HARI DARI HARI INI ( 3/4/2013)

Rabu, 3 April 2013 (Jam 1.00pm)

[Video] Pembubaran Parlimen 2013 dan Tarikh Penting PRU 13!

Pembubaran Parlimen telah diumumkan sebentar tadi pada sekitar jam 11:30 pagi. Ikutilah pengumuman parlimen dalam rakaman video dibawah. 

Menurut Info Sahabat SPR pula berikut adalah tarikh penting sekitar PRU13

3 April 2013 Pembubaran Parlimen
6 April 2013 Perlancaran Manifesto BN di Stadium Merdeka
8 April 2013 Mesyuarat Khas SPR
14 April 2013 Penamaan Calon
27 April 2013 Pembuangan Undi

#PRU13 : [TERKINI] Pembubaran Parlimen Oleh Perdana Menteri.

Sebentar Perdana Menteri telah mengumumkan Pembubaran Parlimen secara rasminya. Pembubaran Parlimen ini berkuatkuasa pada hari ini untuk memberi jalan kepada Pilihan Raya Umum 13 (PRU13) yang akan diadakan tidak lama lagi.


Tweet dari @NajibRazak
















Hari ini merupakan genap 4 tahun beliau menjadi Perdana Menteri Malaysia. Banyak Transformasi tercipta dibawah kepimpinan beliau. Oleh itu, akyat perlu memberi mandat kepada Barisan Nasional untuk mentadbir Malaysia pada PRU13 ini.

Jangan silap di dalam memilih kerajaan, pilihlah kerajaan yang benar2 menjamin masa depan anda yang lebih selamat, maju dan makmur. Amin.

Sekian, Terima kasih

Admin

P/S - Tarikh akhir untuk Hari Pilihanraya - 28 Mei 2013 ( Sumber : Pengerusi SPR - TS Aziz)

BLOG ABG

LIM KIT SIANG - APA LAGI KECOH PARTI HARAM NI HA !!???

The Untold Truth from Lim Kit Siang & DAP

CRONYISM !!

ULTRA KIASU S/O PAP !!

RACIST !!

COMMUNIST !!

The untold truth from Lim Kit Siang (from Joan)

林吉祥故意不告诉你的部分！

民主行动党国会领袖林吉祥打从 开始就针对首相拿督斯里纳吉迄今未解散国会的 情况展开猛烈攻击，即使本届国会任期是在今 年4月28日才届满。林氏甚至蓄意炒作说，现任中 央政府已经“过期”，因为本届政府任期应根据上届 大选日期计算，也就是2008年3月8日。

Lim Kit Siang has been attacking PM Najib re parliament’s dissolution, even where the parliament only expire on the 28 th of April. Lim Kit Siang intentionally played up the issue and accusing the government for being “expired”, stating that the current parliamentary session should have been ended based on the previous polling date. 

1） 林吉祥没有告诉我们的一点， 就是他的观点其实是援引亲民联，或 是自称是宪法专家的资深律师汤米汤 马斯（Tommy Thomas）的谈话。如 果汤马斯的论据成立，则4个民联执政 的州属任期，同样也已经“过期”，因为 这些州属州议会的任期，理应 从2008年3月8日算起。 

Lim Kit Siang was not honest where he did not mention he was merely quoting Tommy Thomas’ statement. But based on Tommy Thomas’ statement, Four states belonged to Pakatan Rakyat are equally “expired”


2） 林吉祥公开表示，民联执政的 槟城、吉打、吉兰丹及雪兰莪，并不 需要比国会提前解散的原因是因为一 旦4个州属比国会提前解散，她们将成 为“看守政府”，这意味州政府有很多事 情都不能做。

Kit Siang openly mentioned that PR states do not need to dissolve before federal parliament or risk becoming a “caretaker” government which cannot do a lot of things. Therefore they are clinging on the governance of these state, despite being “expired”.


3） 由此可见，林吉祥的为人至今 一点都不曾改变，他永远只是告诉民 众一半的故事，蓄意不用同样的标准 来衡量自己。

From this we can see that Kit Siang has not changed since the past. He only does partial revelation, and does not apply the same standard on his own party.

Read more: http://pecahpalakmikir.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-untold-truth-from-lim-kit-siang.html#ixzz2P0t8QkFF


Admin : LK SIANG MALAM KECOH !!! Memang cari pasal Cina 13Mei ni !!!  

Edited Source : Blog Pecah Palak Mikir & ABG